Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)DI
Posts
0
Comments
80
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • You do realize it won’t be any different if her opponent is elected, right?

    https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4653322-donald-trump-joe-biden-weapons-supply-halt-israel-gaza/amp/

    And his base will love him all the more for it.

    https://news.gallup.com/poll/646955/disapproval-israeli-action-gaza-eases-slightly.aspx

    More Americans disapprove of Israel’s military action in Gaza than approve, and their opinions of Netanyahu are also negative on balance. Republicans remain much more likely than Democrats and independents to approve of Israel’s military action and to view Netanyahu favorably, consistent with the party groups’ broader opinions of Israel and the ongoing Israeli-Palestinian conflict. With a possible cease-fire deal and Netanyahu’s U.S. visit looming, Americans’ views of Israel and its leader could shift again in the coming weeks.

    These articles aren’t exactly the most recent, but illustrate that this isn’t a problem unique to Harris or the Biden administration.

  • May I ask why? Legit question. I still occasionally see folks masking and such in my area, but the vast majority of people have gone back to pre-pandemic behaviors. Cases still pop up here and there but most folks treat it like flu… if you get sick, stay home until you’re better.

    If you’ve got an immune issue, I get it. But otherwise, why bother?

  • Second, they need to strip out anything not related to climate change.

    Then it goes nowhere. It’s just more political posturing. Absolutely 100% entirely dead in the water. The Senate and House are both so split down the middle by both parties, it’ll require bipartisan support. It necessarily will have to have riders associated, otherwise it won’t receive the support it needs.

    Yes… this is exactly how wasteful legislation gets passed, but it’s entirely outside the realm of possibility in the real world

  • I agree with the whole experience thing, but there are tons of roles to play in and out of congress. So maybe instead of hard term limits, we do something like, no more that 4 consecutive terms for House members and 2 consecutive terms for Senators, but unlimited non-consecutive terms. That way you get some turnover but experience keeps getting built.

    Idk… just spitballing