DigitalDilemma @ digdilem @lemmy.ml

Posts

2

Comments

549

Joined

2 yr. ago

Cylance was comparable several years ago. But, as you say, Blackberry bought it. Development effectively stopped at that moment. Reported bugs were going un-triaged and the software stopped moving forwards and AV software that isn't constantly adapting becomes a security risk in itself. The two are not comparable now - CS has a lot of extra features, especially in attack monitoring and analysis.

We were Cylance customers, and we changed to Crowdstrike when our contract expired. It was the right choice at the time, as was our decision to choose Cylance before them. Turns out we have pretty crappy luck.

They have a shitload of big contracts with a great many companies across the world. Money keeps coming in.

Legal actions take time. Years. Sometimes decades.

The software, when it isn't bricking computers, is actually pretty good.

This could equally have been caused by any other software running at ring 0. That's most antivirus software and most drivers. Drivers caused BSODs all the time - the difference here is only one of scale and timing. And, as it turns out, some pretty terrible quality control, test processes and release scheduling - and that is likely to be the focus of many of the legal actions.

Your reference to a hacker is spurious - deliberate vs accidental is a major distinction. As is cause and effect - Microsoft can be seen as equally to blame for allowing software to run at ring 0 and allowing this to happen.

Nice ditty.

What reason do you suggest why “his or her” would be preferable to “their” in this context?

Regional dialect, fluidity of language, variety - even habit.

“It’s grammatically incorrect” argument doesn’t hold much water

Oh, I do respectfully disagree with that, especially when you cite medieval English but reference an American language dictionary as your source.

I could just as viably give "his or hers" as equally valid as "theirs", because it is. We're not newspaper headline writers, nobody penalises us if we use a few more characters for any reason. And you could switch back and forth between them both for variety.

The best English literature doesn't follow the basis of most convenient or shortest. Sometimes there are other reasons to choose a word of phrase.

The plot of Romeo and Juliet could be rewritten in a paragraph but probably wouldn't have had the same impact.

Surely y'all have monitoring and alerts for excessive cpu load already?

Especially during the transition from 2 to 3. Let's hope that's all behind us.

Same. Just...works?

Why did we have to learn what modelines were to get a picture on screen?

This just makes me worried to rely on uBO but more because what if the author just fucks off because someone else pissed them off.

That is very concerning to me, also.

Large parts of the internet relying on one or two tiny one-man FOSS projects? (UBO and ADguard are often cited as the only two reliable-ish and safe adblockers)

If he can't be bothered with that nonsense, how secure is UBO's future? How secure is the future of adblocking?

I would bet that advertising companies are rubbing their hands now and planning to ramp up pressure against these poor devs.

I think Ubuntu made sense back in the day when Debian wasn’t as user-friendly.

This is a very good point.

When Ubuntu launched, it was a big moment for linux. Before then, setting up a linux GUI was a lot of pain (remember setting modelines for individual monitors and the endless fiddling that took - and forget about multiple monitors). Ubuntu made GUI easy - it just worked out of the box for most people. It jumped Linux forwards as a desktop a huge way and adoption grew a lot. They also physically posted you a set of CDs or a DVD for free! And they did a bunch of stuff for educational usage, and getting computers across Africa.

That was all pretty amazing at the time and all very positive.

But then everyone else caught up with the usability and they turned into a corporate entity. Somewhere along the way they stopped listening to their users, or at least the users felt they had no voice, and a lot more linux distros appeared.

As you say, lots of spicy food options. Our National Dish is actually a curry - chicken masala and Phall, the hottest curry, was invented in Birmingham.

Also - in the picture are baked beans. They're invented in the USA. We adopted them, but they're not ours.

What's really insane is that sometimes the second identical test actually works.

I used to write to DVD's, but the failure rate was astronomical - like 50% after 5 years, some with physical separation of the silvering. Plus today they're so relatively small they're not worth using.

I've gone through many iterations and currently my home setup is this:

• I have several systems that make daily backups from various computers and save them onto a hard drive inside one of my servers.
• That server has an external hard drive attached to it controlled by a wifi plug controlled by home assistant.
• Once a month, a scheduled task wakes up that external hdd and copies the contents of the online backup directory onto it. It then turns it off again and emails me "Oi, minion. Backups complete, swap them out". That takes five minutes.
• Then I take the usb disk and put it in my safe, removing the oldest of 3 (the classic, grandfather, father, son rotation) from there and putting that back on the server for next time.
• Once a year, I turn the oldest HDD into an "Annual backup", replacing it with a new one. That stops the disks expiring from old age at the same time, and annual backups aren't usually that valuable.

Having the hdd's in the safe means that total failure/ransomware takes, at most, a month's worth. I can survive that. The safe is also fireproof and in another building to the server.

This sort of thing doesn't need to be high capacity HDDs either - USB drives and micro-SD cards are very capable now. If you're limited on physical space and don't mind slower write times (which when automating is generally ok), the microSd's and clear labelling is just as good. You're not going to kill them through excessive writes for decades.

I also have a bunch of other stuff that is not critical - media files, music. None of that is unique and can be replaced. All of that is backed to a secondary "live" directory on the same pc - mostly in case of my incompetence in deleting something I actually wanted. But none of that is essential - I think it's important to be clear about what you "must save" and what is "nice to save"

The clear thing is to sit back and work out a system that is right for you. And it always, ALWAYS should be as automated as you can make it - humans are lazy sods and easily justify not doing stuff. Computers are great and remembering to do repetitive tasks, so use that.

Include checks to ensure the backed up data is both what you expected it to be, and recoverable - so include a calendar reminder to actually /read/ from a backup drive once or twice a year.

It even has the approval of my wife.

He is the chosen one! Hail him!

Strange. That seems to go against the Home Office's own Code of Practice

"13 3.2.2 Any proposed deployment that includes audio recording in a public place is likely to require a strong justification of necessity to establish its proportionality. There is a strong presumption that a surveillance camera system must not be used to record conversations as this is highly intrusive and unlikely to be justified"

I hope they've taken good legal advice.

Never say never - unless you're writing clickbait.

"Justice delayed is justice denied"

Anarchism is all about working together to build a better world where everyone has all of their needs met,

Hmm, I was working with the classic disctionary definition which is "a state of disorder due to absence or non-recognition of authority or other controlling systems."

But you're right, anarchism does have that other meaning, so perhaps a better word would be "chaos".

His actions in supporting Trump in the US, promoting hate and extermist views on X globally, and encouraging civil war in the UK do all fit a chaos agenda. That's not about money - at least, not that I can see.

He is one of the world's most dangerous people, however, and I don't say that lightly. Not least because of his history of being unpredictable.

More governments should follow Brazil's example and push back.

He has more than anyone else in the history of the world. By any scale, he's won at money.

That's been said, and perhaps it has been true. But when you're the richest man in the world by a significant margin, you have literally won at money and to remain competitive you need to move onto other things. Like the power of politics, and working to destabilise multiple countries at once.