devils_advocate @ devils_advocate @lemmy.ml

Posts

0

Comments

91

Joined

2 yr. ago

Does librewolf have tor built in?

What are speed pants?

Oh. My mistake.

Buy a second phone?

Then delete system32 folder?

What are these instructions actually doing?

Familiarity breeds attempt.

Jane Sherwood Ace

One inaccuracy in a historical report allows detractors to call the whole thing a lie.

Invisible instant tattoos delivered in the same way as a vaccine? That is new. It's not easy to mark someone without them knowing.

Gates funded. Tick. Spy program (covert tattooing). Tick.

You're the one moving the goalposts by inventing new GPS tracking strawmen arguments.

Do you often tattoo excel spreadsheets on your body?

SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM X 100

It's the gates funded spy program you referred to. You don't need compute resources or location tags. Just a way to store data on a person.

Get vaccinated, get tattooed

Passed your driving test, get tattooed

Pay your tax, get tattooed

Arrest at a protest, get tattooed

Etc.

Yes. The Oxford vaccine should have been open source. Gates money changed that.

Partially enabled. Without mRNA we still would have had J&J and Astrazenica.

JFK conspiracy theorists would disagree.

You can't logically lump all conspiracies together like that.

Belief isn't needed.

MIT researchers have now developed a novel way to record a patient’s vaccination history: storing the data in a pattern of dye, invisible to the naked eye, that is delivered under the skin at the same time as the vaccine. https://news.mit.edu/2019/storing-vaccine-history-skin-1218

And Bill Gates talking about doing it in a reddit AMA.

Yes. The Jannsen and Oxford vacancies.

However, vaccines using mRNA technology are VERY new.

MIT researchers have now developed a novel way to record a patient’s vaccination history: storing the data in a pattern of dye, invisible to the naked eye, that is delivered under the skin at the same time as the vaccine.

The research was funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

Motive is subjective but the funding isn't.

Still not sure why you are so adamant about giving $5 a month to a monopoly generating 30bn per year. But you be you.

The difference is 45% of $12 and your original goal at the top of this thread was to support your content creators, not YouTube.

"The YouTubers" not your YouTuber.

Better just to split $7 a month between your favourite patreon accounts and put up with some advertising.

That's an ok justification, but I thought you were buying YouTube premium to support your content creator, not to support YouTube. YouTube premium doesn't support your content creator.