devbo @ devbo @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

47

Joined

2 yr. ago

well, i thought of it as fallout 4 in space before playing. it has a couple core gameplay changes i liked and a couple i didn't. it is the slowest paced bethesda game for sure, which is why i think most people call it boring. if you didnt replay skyrim i doubt you would replay this game. i give it a 7/10 for people of my taste and i would consider myself the intended audience. i have played bethesda games since oblivion and average about 200 hours per bethesda game, usually 3 playthroughs seperated by about a year or 2. for reference here are my top bethesda games:

1. Fallout: New Vegas - 9/10(obsidian for a major win)
2. Fallout 3 - 9/10
3. Oblivion - 9/10
4. Skyrim - 8/10
5. Fallout 4 - 8/10
6. Starfield - 7/10
7. Fallout 76 - 3/10 - i wish i could enjoy this game

these scores reflect how much i enjoyed each game. but if New Vegas had no technical issues it would be 10/10 for me.

i had a lot of fun. i think people just expect too much from this type of game and bethesda. look at no mans sky, i still think its just as boring as when it released but it has gained a great following. people now seem to just assume if a game is made by a AAA team everyone must love it regardless of personal taste. in my opinion that mind set is the reason most AAA get focus grouped to death. im scared that people are going to kill off the type of games i like because everyone acts like its crime to release a game that doesn't appeal to everyones exact tastes/desires.

i will say though starfield is my least favorite bethesda game. starfield 7/10

the stoner is probably the happiest out of all three.

why do CEOs never say "lets take our time to avoid making mistakes and insure quality"?

great. i finally get off google and now duckduckgo is bad. i hate the internet.

just admitting you dont know how cooling works. thats cool.

falling is cheating.

In my 10 years of being a High School Robotics teacher i find that my group has less problems with the 3d printers than the 2d printers.

cool.

nevermind then. guess i dont care.

oh, i guess most of the times of heard indie, it was refering to small studios, where as i have never heard anyone call a large studio indie even if they are. thanks for the correction.

and how close is "this" exactly?

why is nobody here saying what the game is an alternative for or what ki d of game play to expect?

what are these alternitives for?

so aren't all indies small? and the non-american thing is just taste.

Why cant you just say you only like either:

• non american games.
• small studios.

It takes people (souls) for a business to exist.

some people are evil.

Who/Where are these people that believe that? I have heard people say shareholders only care about profits, but I have never heard anyone say it was a law to maximize them. Regardless, they do love profits more than anyone or anything at any company. Companies also like to keep their shareholders happy. Evil comes about becuase of these.

I couldn't get through the article after the second "had had". i understand what they are saying, but it still sounds like a child wrote it.

Are you telling me people in the same party, of a 2 party system, can have some differing opinions? crazy thought.