It's a tool in a box. Maybe an artist can use it get some inspiration and not actually use any of the generated images. Or generate a backdrop for their portrait drawing. Or generate a composition they like and then draw over it.
Wut? Are you serious? You're just going to boil down an entire artform to that? That's an unbelievably reductive opinion.
That's kind of the point, isn't it? People might spend a lot of time learning the different AI tools, how to supplement them with post processing and manual edits, how to combine them and how to nudge them in the direction they want, and then spend countless evenings trying to get the result they want.
And people are going to say "they just AI generated it, they are not artists", just like people might say photographers are not artists, they just take a photo.
But we know it's far from "just" taking a photo or "just" generating it with AI. Sure, you can "just" do both, but the result will be far from real art without all the preparation and extra work.
But it's easy to take a random shitty AI image to laught at, just like it's easy to take a random shitty photo.
I like Vivaldi and they are going to keep V2 support for a while. I will switch to Firefox when it's gone, but for the time being I am happy they are keeping the support.
Well, without making money on the philanthropy videos he wouldn't have money to continue making philanthropy videos.
He may be doing it as a 100% selfish thing, but so what? The end result is that lots of lives are improved. I won't watch his videos, but I'm glad people are being helped.
I don't disagree, but it feels like every other cereal, pack of crisps and bar of chocolate I see in stores advertises you can win a car or something. Which is stupid, but it's weird to call out some guy for doing something very common across many other products.
I was buying crisps to win plastic Pokémon and ice cream to win money 25 years ago. Sure, call out the practice, but you are making it sound like it's not an ubiquitous type of promotion.
The cybertruck has enough issues that I wouldn't want one, but yeah I would like a car looking like that, if it was actually a good car not made by Tesla.
What's up with everyone calling it ugly? It's a shit car, but I think it looks cool. Something that has no place in reality, but fitting in a video game.
The point isn't that liquids are explosive, the point is that water messes up the explosives detection. It's "liquids are not allowed, because water is a false positive for explosives and we want to avoid the false positive".
That's why it's starting to get allowed in many airports - they updated their detectors to newer technology where water is no longer a false positive.
It's a tool in a box. Maybe an artist can use it get some inspiration and not actually use any of the generated images. Or generate a backdrop for their portrait drawing. Or generate a composition they like and then draw over it.