They were used as example heuristics by Google marketing when they launched the checkbox reCaptcha. They were just simple to understand things for marketing purposes, but in reality Google checks many different signals and isn't based on mouse movements. But people keep repeating the example from the ad.
So during the test the teacher listed element names out loud with no pauses, and you were supposed to write down the symbol while she was speaking, and then another list in reverse. After the last element we had to immediately put the pens down. Whole test took ~45 seconds for 30 elements.
This was so that it was impossible to read from the big table on the wall, you had no time to look away from the paper. You'd miss the next 3 elements by the time you looked away to find the one.
Strategy? You are assuming there was any intent behind it. The reviewers in third world countries are probably spending 30 seconds per app and are bound to make mistakes. Which in this case was reverted.
I'm not saying what's "the correct play" or not, I'm refuting the claim all Chromium-based browsers are immediately affected, because I know of at least one that will keep V2 support.
But I will keep using Vivaldi. It will take me the same time to migrate to Firefox regardless if I do it today or a year from now when Vivaldi drops V2 support. I have nothing to gain by migrating sooner, but potentially much to gain by waiting.
Vivaldi might decide to keep support indefinitely,
Vivaldi might decide to update the built-in ad blocker to use UBlock Origin tech,
Google might backtrack the decision (hah!),
a whole different browser I want to try might come out in the meantime and I'd have to migrate twice,
Firefox might die after losing Google funding due to the monopoly ruling.
I will build a new PC in a year and it will be a good time for a software refresh,
Or, the most likely, none of this will happen, and I will migrate to Firefox then, if that's the best move at the time.
There is also the difference that Facebook the service is still called Facebook. Only the company name changed, but not the product name. Where for Twitter, he renamed both the product and the company.
I agree, I'm just saying this story in particular is untrue. That, obviously, doesn't excuse all the other things they actually did, like the ones you linked here.
I absolutely agree it's their fault for getting bad press, and that they should have checked in order to not get bad press. I just don't think the bad press is about something of importance, especially that there is no shortage of illegal things Trump did to write about.
No they shouldn't, they should be in prison, not be able to charter any planes.
I don't know, when I get a taxi I don't ask the driver who owned his car previously. Seems very wasteful to consider vehicles somehow bad based on previous owners.
The plane is part of a small fleet managed by the California-based Threshold Aviation Group, which makes it available for chartering.
Epstein owned at least five different private planes before his death.
So these 5 planes, sold off after Epstein's death and bought by a chartering company cannot be used ever again by anyone, because Epstein used to own them? And people chartering planes have to research the history of the plane their chartering company is offering for their flight?
Press the volume down button. This will immediately silence the call without hanging up.