dev_null @ dev_null @lemmy.ml

Posts

0

Comments

686

Joined

2 yr. ago

Remember, remember, the 5th of November

What do you actually have in mind? Are you using the word "influencer" in some narrow way? Every streamer influences their viewers so my reading of your comment is that you are asking for a streaming service that doesn't allow streaming. Obviously you don't mean that, so I'm curious what do you mean.

It was for a 1000, doubling every day of non-payment, for many months now. Which is how it reached the ridiculous amounts, and also how any amount you see is quickly outdated because it doubles every day.

Yeah, that's what I said.

That's 100 free miles a week. Sure, most people will need to charge it anyway, but that's still 100 free miles a week.

But I don't think it's a good idea. It would be more efficient to just put the same solar panels in your roof, where they don't contribute to the car's weight, don't force your to park in sunlight instead of indoor parking or garage, and whose output can be used for charging the car OR for anything else as needed.

I agree, but that has nothing to do with the release cadence.

No, not nice at all. I'm answering your question on why he doesn't ban Israeli contributors, not deliberating on the niceness of anyone in particular.

All in all, the film makers had many things they could choose to make the effect look plausible, but they didn't.

You can't be pardoned from a lawsuit. This is not a criminal case, just Musk getting sued, which you can't get out of with a pardon.

His lawyers were there, and so the defense party was there. He wasn't required to be there, contrary to what the post tries to imply.

No, because he wasn't required to show up. The defense was required to show up, and it did, as Musk's lawyers were present. The post is just clickbait trying to make you think he was required to show up.

And it's a lawsuit, not a criminal charge, so no jail time is in the cards, sadly, no matter how hard he loses.

His lawyers showed up, which fulfills "all parties must be present", as the defense was present.

It's clickbait, Musk wasn't required to show up personally.

You could make an argument that there was some kind of huge spinning gyroscope reaction wheel system on that axis which projected the explosion that way.

But we all know there wasn't.

@RemindMe @RemindMe@programming.dev 15 years, tell this guy he's wrong

It was fine in Mr Robot.

That's just confirmation bias. You assume it's true because it makes sense given other things you know.

If I make up a fact that you are a technology enthusiast, people can assume it's true, you are using Lemmy, it makes sense. And it might be true, but it doesn't change the fact I completely made it up.

He was asked what they are working on now that they released Windows 10. He said they are still working on Windows 10 as it's the last (latest) release of Windows and still being developed. Yes he could have worded it better.

I completely agree he was unprofessional about it and should have handled it better. It was his choice in how he communicated it, and I think he failed on that point. Having said that, it was not his choice to do it, and I'm sure he will undue it when it's legally possible. Hopefully using better judgement on his choice of words then.

And even that engineer only said "last" to mean "latest", which is obvious from context, but why let that get in the way of clickbaity articles.

So you are advocating for slowing down the work on Android, or for keeping the pace the same but witholding the updates for longer before a release? Or something else?