What's Linux? Why are you making a strawman to found yoer disagreement, there is no inherent value to what you believe to be obvious.
"Linux the kernel" is a wonder of the software world. One free and open source kernel codebase to rule them all, a culture, a license that enshrines that culture. The kernel is great as it is.
"Linux the kernel packaged with software used on the desktop" is flaming garbage. That's not to say it's worse, modern windows is like using the lava from Chernobyl to keep warm on a brisk evening. MacOS is relatively acceptable but Apple isn't. Open source BSD based OSes are cumbersome on the edges of general computing. Android is all but Google OS at this point. Ultimately no practical, actually useful alternatives to linux on the desktop actually exist. This does NOT mean we have to convince ourselves it is actually good.
"Linux the kernel and a server OS package" is great, can't go wrong with this. Love it, genuinely.
"Linux for embedded devices" is a fucking travesty. Still happens.
Various opinion roundup:
nix is the only case of anyone ever truly imagining what they could do with a Linux system
"open source" does not provide value, the implications do, when true
Linux is as secure as your dedication to never using software from outside the package manager is. Oh you installed discord? steam? compiled something and fetched dependencies? Those aren't the package manager, oops! (Discord gladly downloads its own updates whether you think you've stopped that or not)
Fewer viruses you've heard of
Regular security updates is a low effort troll given the corporate OSes are paid to do so
You're not even right. You are genuinely activating the SIM card and anyone around you paraphrasing to "activating a phone" is also correct, because nobody cares what other meaning you personally wish to ascribe to the task.
The better analogy is that people live in houses and houses have addresses, and I can use an address to find someone's house.
Whether the pointed data by the pointer is valid or not is... not the point. In all languages I can think of, dereferencing an invalid pointer like a pointer to the wrong address per the type and alignment is never valid. Your analogy does not improve on historical analogies and it is wrong.
This is just a more complex version of shared dictionary compression which I think one of the web compression algorithms does. Stupid LLM fuckers at it again with dumb garbage.
It should be mentioned that nobody is allowed to decide to have the opinion that "since medication x is removed, we should advocate for the removal of more popular medication y"
So remember, you fight for both medications as an individual. This article only points out that it makes no sense to attempt to justify excluding care for transgender people. Don't make it about excluding care from your "enemy" or "other" in retaliation if you can help it.
Probably depends on the kid. In the right house with the right mindset I bet parents could use first names. Otherwise it will probably be a special word to all of them, maybe something the kid calls them one day that sticks.
Maybe the parents will look to the internet or peers for answers and get stuff like "guardian" "my other parent" etc but ultimately the real question you should ask is how a child addresses their two same-gendered parents, maybe there's something to contexutalize there.
English is not "constructed" nor does its development to the point reflect high levels of intent like someone sitting down and deciding they decide what the best language is.
If you suppose a multiple choice test MUST ONLY have one correct answer:
Eliminate duplicate 25% answers
You are left with 60% and 50% as potential answers to this question.
C is the answer
If you were to actually select an answer at random to this question while believing the above, you would have a 50% chance of answering 25%.
It is obvious to postulate that: for all multiple choice questions with no duplicate answers, there is a 25% chance of selecting the correct answer.
However as you can see, in order to integrate the answer being C with the question itself, we have to destroy the constraints of the solution and treat the duplicate 25% answers as one sum correct answer.
Do you choose to see the multiple choice answer space as an expression of the infinite space of potential free form answers? Was the answer to the question itself an expression of multiple choice probability or was it the answer from the free form answer space condensed into the multiple choice answer space?
The question demonstrates arriving at different answers between inductive and deductive reasoning. The answer depends on whether we are taking the answers and working backwards or taking the question and working forwards. The question itself forces the inductive reasoning strategy to falter at the duplicate answers, leading to deductive reasoning being the remaining strategy. Some may choose to say "there is no answer" in the presence of needing to answer a question that only has an answer because we are forced to pick one option, and otherwise would be invalid. Some may choose to point out it is obviously a paradox.
For anyone who can't read that many words at once: URI means identifier and URL means locator.
Matrix does not mix the roles of its URIs beyond the ability to attempt to reach that homeserver through NOT ONLY DNS but also through routing between homeservers. Matrix, unlike this garbage, actually wants to support ephemeral homeservers and such as well.
Sadly these web technology fucks cannot get their heads even a centimeter further towards the exit of their anus to even risk beginning to care about how garbage their architectures are.