Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)DE
Posts
0
Comments
356
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • You're framing this as if the people behind you are in any way involved in your decision to make a right on a red. You're also saying its not optional, which is just blatantly incorrect.

    When turning right on red, you get to decide when is safe, not the people behind you. You are not required to turn because that would be a massive safety hazard because people would feel rushed into prevailing traffic, and objectively deciding when a turn was safe to execute is hard when you feel rushed. Being rushed makes everyone less safe, especially pedestrians, because you are distracted. Distracted.

    You do not know how responsive their car is, you do not know how comfortable they are full sending it, and you probably cannot see the road as well as they do. This is why when they go is not your decision.

    What a beyond stupid take, you are lucky you live somewhere where you are allowed to have your license even though you clearly cannot drive.

    Hoonnnkk honnnnkk hooonnnk you go as the person in front of you has a ped crossing in front of them you can't see.

    Hoooonnnkk honnnkk honnnnkk you go as there's a small gap, but the person in front of you is driving with their mom recovering from surgery, in pain and feeling carsick.

    Hooonnkkk honnnkk honnnk you go as a mother is being screamed at by her kids and is trying to get a small moment of rest at the red light, slightly delaying their turn.

    You're a self absorbed dumbass.

  • Salty writer fears being made obsolete by beep boop.

    i hate how popular it's become to hate on AI amongst people who know little to nothing about it.

    Id forgive it if it were clever or funny, but this is really just obviously salty ad hominem strawmanning by someone who doesn't understand or appreciate the technology

    The fucking irony of your own words is incredible. Oh my fucking god.

    Oh man... to throw my towel in the ring as someone who knows about it: it's fucking dumb, no it is not the future of everything. LLMs aren't even "artifically intelligent" they're just machine learning.

  • Hm, I don't think that is impossible and I'd love to see it go that way. I would love for a streaming service to make any step towards being good for the consumer instead of the share holders.

  • You realize you don't need to list all your changes in the commit message, right? Anyone can blame or diff said changes.

    The commit message is meant to be used for the high level stuff, the intent, representing / connecting progress towards a larger work item, and other important context from outside the codebase. Insert other reasons that aren't saying literally what was changed if you feel I have missed something.

    Also one should use their time better if they are spending so much time writing commit messages they feel the need to automate it. Commit messages are rarely read ever again (once merged, lets say), it is not okay to be spending a lot of time on them. That's not an excuse to write bad commit messages, but you have to balance the time cost with expected utility.

    And an addendum to the above. Describing what you did without reasoning, context, or other information that isnt captured within the changes itself makes your commit messages entirely useless. It makes IDE-inserted in-line blame information useless as well. Thus you are now wasting all the time you spend on commit messages, even if you spend less because it's automated.

  • Man, fuck taking any step in the right direction eh? Let's just hope for the entire world to change instead of hoping for a reasonable change that is a big step in the right direction.

    "Can't have anything if it isn't perfect"

  • You and the person who also claimed the comment youre replying to was wrong cannot read. Whether wages are rising faster than inflation is irrelevant when we are years and years behind. All that means is that we are on an uphill trajectory.

    If you have 20 apples to start, and you have to pay me 1/3 apple per month. You make 2 apples per month. Over a year I raise that tax to 1+1/3 apples.

    If over the next year, I raise your apple income by 2/3 of an apple and your apple tax by 1/3, your earnings increase outpaces the increase of my apple tax, but you're still completely fucked.

  • Nope! Less money to buy food makes only the most calorie dense processed garbage affordable. Furthermore the more stress Americans are forced to endure, the more they will turn to harmful coping methods like over eating and more.

  • How is this newsworthy? One death of a Dutch person is grounds for an entire news article? When are the articles for everyone else killed in the crossfire / while engaged in conflict going to come.

    It sounds like a fallacy but where and why are we drawing this line?

    Edit: the original NOS article is not out of place, I just read it and its pretty typical. Why the secondary reporting? My issue is with "dutchnews.nl"

  • My native language is English.

    What irritates me most is the whole thing. The language is so incredibly contextual that it is a pain in the ass once you learn something less contextual. It seems deeply infected with all the parts of English/American culture that I hate. It feels like you cannot just say what you mean, you have to dance in circles and obscure the point. Theres no need for it to be so complicated.