deranger @ deranger @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

178

Joined

2 yr. ago

I don’t think the answer is an outright ban of dog meat; does this address cruelty against farm animals, or is it a feel good political move from the current ruling party? Korea loves pork, pigs are treated similarly, and I don’t see any calls for reform there.

I’ve never eaten dog meat but it’s not my place to judge. If the issue is inhumane conditions, then address those. The issue is not consumption of dog meat.

It’s better at spotting patterns, but without knowing the why and how the machine arrived at its conclusions, I think it’s going to be fairly limited in application.

Your detective example is just as likely to reveal our biases as it’s going to find a clue. It’s all in the training, and we can’t eliminate our own cultural biases. What’s the data set for suspicious behavior consist of? Who chooses it?

There’s a ton of AI hype and it’s barely had any impact in actual real life despite billions of dollars invested. I’m still not convinced. It was very cool for a few weeks until the limitations became very obvious to me.

Considering aviation is 2.5% of global CO2 emissions, you could get rid of all the aviation emissions and still be very far off from saving anything.

The headline seems much more sensational than the numbers lead me to believe.

That’s a flippant response when you were asked specifically to pretend they were your monkeys.

This isn’t fear mongering. You cannot participate in political rallies etc in uniform.

Edit: this is more of a weekend safety brief thing

At issue was a planned Nov. 17 event dubbed the "Dakota Patriot Rally" at the state fairgrounds in Minot, and the text warned personnel "to be cautious" if they were in the area, especially because some rally-goers "could be confrontational to military members."

I didn’t find this boring whatsoever. It was great seeing the creation process of such a foundational game.

What does this have to do with modern gaming? It’s a retrospective.

That’s odd, because it works really well on iOS as a persistent web app.

Wish these weren’t videos, is there text anywhere?

You should post the # of bits of identifying info it was able to derive. Best I’m able to do is 15 bits or so. Never seen it below 14, meaning you’re able to be nearly uniquely fingerprinted everywhere.

That was stated to the people who outed him.

iPhones aren’t any better

Anyone got a source for this claim? I see it repeated often in this thread with no supporting evidence.

I’m not disputing it, I’d just like to know more.

I’m not disputing the content of order 227, I’m disputing the historical accuracy of the film. Yes, they did have supply issues, penal battalions, and blocking units in the Soviet army, but not like it was depicted in the film.

All in all, the most likely way that a soldier or officer would interact with a barrier troop was not through being cut down by a Maxim, but through arrest and drumhead court martial. Especially in the case of the NKVD detachments, they wouldn’t be set up right at the line of battle, but some ways to the rear, where they would apprehend retreaters, run a quick show “trial”, execute a few to make an example, and sentence considerably more to serve time in a penal unit.

https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/3pcjfv/comment/cw54qf3/?context=3

Enemy at the Gates is a decent flick, but it’s pretty inaccurate. I wouldn’t be citing it as a source on what actually happened on the eastern front.