No, but mine is slightly more likely to engage in mutual self-interest than China is, as I argued in my previous comment. The US ain't perfect, but China is far less so.
Hmm, I don't know... Maybe it's a fantasy but I trust my country (US) to at least somewhat have my interests at heart, if for no other reason than mutual self-interest and absolutely nothing else. I can't say the same for China. I do think they have nefarious purposes. Not only that, but there's some chance of discovering what US companies are up to. I couldn't even begin to imagine how one would obtain information about what Chinese companies are doing, they're basically an extension of the CCP, which has gone off the deep end, sadly, at least in my fairly uninformed opinion.
The toxic beliefs that are taught are part of the trauma. Certainly not an excuse, no, but good to be aware of if we want to help people break the cycle.
As far as the whole "sleep on the couch" thing, I don't tend to think grown adults should be telling one another where they're allowed to sleep just because one of them is upset, but that's a different topic.
Well, some probably. But also, humans are often violent. It's pretty hardwired in. And some men are wired to be more violent than others unfortunately. That's before we even get into cycles of abuse and all that environmental stuff. Like, the 1920s were three generations ago. Not excusing them at all, but lots of men are dealing with generational trauma that easily goes back further than that.
Republicans increasingly rely on the most extreme voting base for energy. It works mostly because we only have two viable parties and even the less extreme Republicans think the extreme right is the lesser of two evils. How many Republicans do you suppose will wring their hands in 2024 but vote for MAGA candidates and Trump anyway? Almost all, even if they say otherwise. We know preference falsification is a thing now. People will just lie if they're too embarrassed to admit what they're doing.
If I've learned anything from Musk and Zuckerberg, it's that the super rich really aren't all that competent. They know how to operate within the system as it is and leverage their existing advantage. I'm pretty sceptical that they can actually save themselves either. They'll need other people to do that for them, but the problem they face is, why wouldn't those people just take charge themselves? Once the system they operate in is gone, what do the wealthy really have to offer? No actual skills for the most part. It's all socially fabricated smoke and mirrors.
Yes, they specifically have said they don't want AI companies to get their user data for free. What's interesting is that we as a culture have internalized and accepted the idea that our user-made content is something only tech companies have the right to profit from and fight over.
True, it would be amazing. I'm just ambivalent about the long-term impact. Like, would much really change ultimately? I guess we've never experienced another species we could directly communicate ideas with. Maybe it would be more revolutionary than I can imagine.
Ooh... Sleepover!