decisivelyhoodnoises @ decisivelyhoodnoises @sh.itjust.works

Posts

0

Comments

96

Joined

2 yr. ago

If you're not trolling you're stupid af

Sure, they developed this mentality when surviving could also be competitive. When there was not enough food for all and somehow surviving meant that it will not be for all. Now we prefer to destroy tones of food in favor of economy because if there is extra food this means that the price go down

Is this a genuine question wanting to find an answer? Only their consciousness can really prevent them or a "law enforcement" that we should first find a way to be uncorrupted. Is this realistic nowadays? Of course not, but we were talking hypothetically I think

Goodbye

They incentive would be the prosperity of the community as long as people stop seeing each other competitive. Personal gain over dead bodies is only cancer.

Other animals are in intense life and death competition with each other generally.

Humans on the other hand, travel to the other half of the earth in order to kill other humans because they're afraid that other humans will destroy their economy in the other side of the earth.

Talk to me more about the superiority of humans over animals. I'm listening

I don't disagree with you. I'm just asking (theoretically) how could such system regulate itself? Would the travel be mandated?

Yeah I think it is cultural but this should be illegal too. This is what I was doing in kindergarten when I was mixing all the sauces and I was thinking that it was exceptional. Mixing 5 end-products is not considered "recipe" in some parts of the world

ketchup

Yeah this should he illegal, wtf

Sure. So your idea is that people should be mandated to travel and change places every X years? Or what? I don't get it.

Isn't the problem the disproportionate accumulation of goods, resources and money? AKA capitalism? I mean theoretically, if you restrict these, you can also settle in one place without taking advantage and destroying everything around it.

Yeah so what? The problem is the disproportionate accumulation of resources, goods or money. Which leads to accumulation of more of them, which lead to accumulation of power. There must be a limit on personal concentration of these. Anything above a level that is considered personal should belong to the community. Then there will be no incentive to make people capable of exploiting other people.

Yes, but as long as the "better" community doesn't interfere and doesn't try to take advantage of the less good communities I don't see a problem. And of course doesn't steal them their area and resources. Or does't try to expand in ways that they accumulate more goods and resources than they need and can consume

So while hunting and gathering was not necessarily a bad way of life, it did not allow for imperialism and was subsequently diminished by the imperialists.

Have you seen nowadays how they fish? They destroy whole huge areas leaving no fish behind. This is a type of imperialism. The problem is capitalism in its nature

Thank you for referring this community. Its the first time I see it and it was very inspirational. Cheers

No, but you should not be allowed to accumulate more than what you can consume when your community is starving

Yes you can set the timeout duration

I think you meant to type keepassxc

Keepassxc has a keyboard which you can change to and it fills fields without typing (you need to type your master password though)

I laughed normally

Nice and funny with the deckil honses hahaha Thank you!