Skip Navigation

Posts
16
Comments
318
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • he probably should have expected that

  • actually agree, I copied the summary but it's more sensational than it should be.. I'm excited but I've just gone from 1% believing it to 5%, it's far from confirmed.

    considering what it would mean I'm still super excited however.. but I'll edit the summary

  • thank you!

    this almost seems like it could be something 😬

  • According to the simulation apparently it only works if the copper atoms end up in an unlikely place in the crystal, so fabrication might be unreliable. I recall someone in another thread saying the authors themselves had around a 10% success rate. So other efforts to replicate are likely to see more failures until the fabrication is better understood. Makes sense I guess.

    The fact that another team saw something I think is really hopeful, even if it's hard to produce and poorly understood, if there is a room-temp effect then it's only a matter of time before it's studied properly and understood. From there hopefully a reliable method of fabrication can be published.

    If there is no effect replicated anywhere then the paper is fraud, but if there's any effect replicated then it's just a matter of study and engineering to figure out what it is. It would be interesting even if it isn't exactly room temp superconductivity.

  • wait, really? other people have confirmed this might be real? I'm not sure i'm ready for that.. i don't dare hope, you know?

    but also, if another unrelated team has demonstrated room-temp Meissner effect, that means this might be true, right?

  • to be fair I thought the same! that's weird 🤯

  • yeah I'd prefer a PR that removes the filename and actually builds so it could be merged.. the emojis might be better as a comment. although json doesn't support comments iirc so maybe just a thoughtful commit message.

  • I use it.. I don't agree to ads so I don't get coins. which is great because I don't want coins, I just want no ads.

  • I think full federated auth across servers is a much more difficult problem - it'd be nice but outside the scope of this request!

  • Ya if it’s not federated already, I’m thinking the link will just remain as-is?

    yeah that seems entirely reasonable. it'll still be a big improvement in most cases. also even if it only happens as it federates initially it'll probably still catch many cases. is it possible to do a follow-up check only for links that weren't updated the first time? if you could store a cool-off and maximum number of tries that would probably keep it light and as functional as possible.

    when serving posts with un-processed links that haven't been updated, and it hasn't been checked in the last 3 hours, re-check for a federated article and update. do this for up to 24 hours after the comment is posted, after that just give up? that gives it a few opportunities but doesn't continue to waste resources if it's unlikely the link will be resolved.

    I'm not sure if it's easy to add columns to track those attempts though.

  • oh that's awesome! yeah i can see it being an issue especially if that post isn't already federated. would be a great quality of life improvement though.

  • ok sounds like it's not a feature - the link format i suggested includes both the instance ID and the instance url, so it would be possible for your home server to use that to preprocess to a useable link. I wonder if there's a suggestions box 🙂

  • ahhh that makes sense. i was remembering microsoft getting broken up/fined and wondered how an "everything company" could possibly avoid that. turns out you have to have a monopoly to start with, which might have been an issue before he tanked twitter. so i guess genius move, 5d chess etc

  • I think my home instance blocks porn-only instances, which is fine with me. I can open an account on the porn instance if I want, it's not the same kind of browsing.

  • I wonder if competition law has anything to say about companies that do everything

  • I think personal micro-blogging (mastodon) and posting forum-style topics (reddit) can have different words?