daniskarma @ daniskarma @lemmy.dbzer0.com

Posts

3

Comments

1,353

Joined

1 yr. ago

Ok tidy up this place. We have visitors coming soon.

When half the posts in your feed are "X instance bad" people get just tired and go out.

It has happened to me sometimes a meaningful part of my feed was just people brigading about some instance they don't like. It's ridiculous.

Nah, they are underpowered for their current price. When you could get your hand on a raspberry pi 3 for 35€ 10 years ago it was a bargain. But now it's not the case.

There's zero relationship between data being unencrypted and it being sent to chinese servers.

If you use a chinese service it's obvious that data is going to be sent to a chinese server and that the chinese server would be able to read it.

Unencrypted data transfer, it's a totally different thing. I would like to see if it's truly unencrypted or just not using apple proprietary encryption.

I luckily don't own any apple product, but I have deepseek app on my android device. If I'm bored later I'll try to intercept my own data to see if it's truly unencrypted. This is easy to test. If it's not true that newspaper is going to my "block list" asap.

I think any mini-pc/old laptop is better, and probably cheaper than a raspberry pi nowadays

Did they fix this bug when you put writer in Fullscreen it won't actually be fullscreen and let a border of one pixel all around? It has been there ages.

And redbull give you wings.

Marketing within a capitalist market be like that for every product.

If you are sitting just slap your legs while saying "Well..." and doing a noise like you were a 107 yo who just got up for first time in 13 years.

I have thought a lot on it. The LLM per se would not know if the question is answerable or not, as it doesn't know if their output is good of bad.

So there's various approach to this issue:

1. The classic approach, and the one used for censoring: keywords. When the llm gets a certain key word or it can get certain keyword by digesting a text input then give back a hard coded answer. Problem is that while censoring issues are limited. Hard to answer questions are unlimited, hard to hard code all.
2. Self check answers. For everything question the llm could process it 10 times with different seeds. Then analyze the results and see if they are equivalent. If they are not then just answer that it's unsure about the answer. Problem: multiplication of resource usage. For some questions like the one in the post, it's possible than the multiple randomized answers give equivalent results, so it would still have a decent failure rate.

He is definitely in the same list as Trump and Elon Musk.

They are not random per se. They are just statistical with just some degree of randomization.

That happens when do you not understand what is a llm, or what its usecases are.

This is like not being impressed by a calculator because it cannot give a word synonym.

Italian economy had always been better than Spain.

And Spain have been never short of organized crime. They were just not been prosecuted precisely because successors or Franco who made such crime got government positions in the new democracy instead of getting the rope.

I'll wait for the Julian Assange review.

Yeah, I've heard the "they statistically commit more crimes" elsewhere. Same vibes.

How is this not bigotry and discrimination toward a group of population?

I've seen the same post in far right groups just changing the word man by some racial slur. Same energy. And also same bigots trying to justify their intolerance with shitty statistics.

Not all crops are created equal.

Crops intended for livestock are way easier to farm, require less water, less pesticides, less fertilizer, and less taking care of.

Many times crops intended for livestock are a necessary part of rotatory crops. As they tend to be easier on the land.

Farming is not as easy as "you can grow anything in any given land".

All art is derivative.

"Don't be evil"

What about we be evil anyway?

Personally, I don't really care.

I do enjoy some types of AI content, I do not enjoy others. Same as any other type of content. So that tag would be useless for my personal preferences.

Anyway nsfw tag is made not for moral reasons, but to avoid those images showing when you are in an environment that's not proper for them (basically so it doesn't look like you are watching porn at work), this makes no sense for AI content, So I don't see the point besides some kind of persecution driven by a particular ideology. So I don't support it.