daniskarma @ daniskarma @lemmy.dbzer0.com

Posts

3

Comments

1,332

Joined

1 yr. ago

Most people have exactly the same opinion about any self-driving car. Even those using lidar.

Lemmy has a high anti technology bias.

I would lo to be able to justify buying a 1500€ vr set. But using it for one or two games does not make the threshold for me.

I hope they make more really good games so it become justifiable.

Ok, clippy I will go climbing that dangerous mountain during storm season.

Drunk humans get tricked by things that computerized cars does not, though.

But by the state of the current butlerian yihad anything technologically advanced is to be criticized and destroyed, even if it saves lives.

Results may vary depending on the alcohol currently running in the human blood.

One of the things I am advocate for self driving cars is that they cannot get drunk and drive.

Edit: aaah yes, Lemmy, downvoted per telling that people drink and drive. Classic Lemmy.

Not every program is written for spacecraft, and does not net the critique level of safety and efficiency as the code for the Apollo program.

I don't even know. If memory issues are your issue then using any program with safe memory embedded into it is the way to go. As most things are actually made right now. Unless you are working in legacy applications most programmers would never actually run into that many memory issues nowadays. Not that most programmers would even properly understand memory. Do you think the typical JavaScript bootcamp rookie can even differentiate when something is stored in the stack or the heap?

You are talking like every human made code have Linux Kernel levels of quality, and that's not the case, not by far.

And it doesn't need to. Not all computer programs are critically important, people be coding in lua for pico-8 in a gamejam, what's the issue for them to use AI tools for assistance?

And AI have not existed before a couple of years and our critically important programs are everywhere. Written by smart humans who are making mistakes all the time. I still do not see the anti-AI point here.

Also programming is not concrete, and AI is not sugar. If you use AI to create a fast tree structure and it works fine, it's not going to poison anything. It's probably be just the same function that the programmer would have written, just faster.

Also, not addressing the fact thar if AI is bad because it's just copying, then it's the same as the most common programming texhnique, copying code from Stack Overflow.

I have a genuine question, how many programmers do you think that code in the way you just described?

I don't think the United States is going to turn into freaking Yemen. It's not good for your mental health and those surrounding you to start thinking you are actually going to get executed or something like that.

I just wish my language didn't had any tildes. They are tiring to write and easily forgotten.

Electron everywhere.

Law enforcement have tools that crack both Android and Apple phones en seconds.

You can actually apply those tools and procedures to automatically generated code, exactly the same as in any other piece of code. I don't see the impediment here....

You must be able to understand that searching by name is not the same as searching by definition, nothing more to add here...

Why would you care of the shit code submitted to you is bad because it was generated with AI, because it was copied from SO, or if it's brand new shit code written by someone. If it's bad is bad. And bad code have existed since forever. Once again, I don't see the impact of AI here. If someone is unable to find that a particular generated piece of code have issues, I don't see how magically is going to be able to see the issue in copypasted code or in code written by themselves. If they don't notice they don't, no matter the source.

I will go back to the Turing test. If you don't even know if the bad code was generated, copied or just written by hand, how are you even able to tell that AI is the issue?

A job that let's you enough free time to enjoy your hobbies.

Any human written code can and will introduce UB.

Also I don't see how you will take more that 5 second to verify that a given function does not exist. It has happen to me, llm suggesting unexisting function. And searching by function name in the docs is instantaneous.

I you don't want to use it don't. I have been more than a year doing so and I haven't run into any of those catastrophic issues. It's just a tool like many others I use for coding. Not even the most important, for instance I think LSP was a greater improvement on my coding efficiency.

It's like using neovim. Some people would post me a list of all the things that can go bad for making a Frankenstein IDE in a ancient text editor. But if it works for me, it works for me.

We still use it in my job.

Pls help.

By played hours the Binding Of Isaac probably.

By impact in my heart Metal Gear Solid.

What's the legality of that land?

Where I live there's no way a plot of land is suited for both farming and a Hotel.

If you build something in a place where residential/commercial buildings are not allowed you are in for a lot of troubles.

If the weather provides the safest bet for the most profit would probably be plant some easy trees or some plant that would not need a lot of caring, and just sell the products.

That for money. If I were you and I had money to throw I would just built a retire House for myself and collect my returns in peace of mind and health. But then again, residential buildings may not be allowed there.

I remember managing to install two DE one above the other, and having them, somehow working at the exact same time. That was trippy.

I didn't even know how I did it. I'm pretty sure that I couldn't replicate that on purpose.

I work in europe in sector that have signed that we only have to work 35 hours a week. So I work 8 to 15 and that's it.

The secret sauce is that we have massive unions. So we have achieve a lot of labor rights.

You should see my desk is full of propaganda of 4 different unions, and everyone desk is the same, Unions are very present in my sector.

When I go lunch I go home for the day. I only work in the morning.

So, no need of alcohol to cope with overwork.

That's why you use unit test and integration test.

I can write bad code myself or copy bad code from who-knows where. It's not something introduced by LLM.

Remember famous Linus letter? "You code this function without understanding it and thus you code is shit".

As I said, just a tool like many other before it.

I use it as a regular practice while coding. And to be true, reading my code after that I could not distinguish what parts where LLM and what parts I wrote fully by myself, and, to be honest, I don't think anyone would be able to tell the difference.

It would probably a nice idea to do some kind of turing test, a put a blind test to distinguish the AI written part of some code, and see how precisely people can tell it apart.

I may come back with a particular piece of code that I specifically remember to be an output from deepseek, and probably withing the whole context it would be indistinguishable.

Also, not all LLM usage is for copying from it. Many times you copy to it and ask the thing yo explain it to you, or ask general questions. For instance, to seek for specific functions in C# extensive libraries.