Dude, you're the one being rude. I was done with this conversation yesterday and you just keep coming back like it's an argument you can "win" by insisting that I think like you and change my behaviour to be like you.
You started the whole thread looking for input and when you didn't get the response you wanted you just berated the respondents telling then how wrong they were.
I'm done here. You've forced me to go digging around Lemmy to see if there's a block function.
No, I haven't tried to poke a hole in a sandbox. Generally speaking, if I have a choice between pacman -S <app> or "install with Flatpak and then fiddle with sandbox settings" I opt for the former. I get that you think this is important, and Flatpak is a nifty idea, but in terms of usability, it has failed me repeatedly to the point where I don't want to use it, so I don't.
You seem to be coming from a position of "Flatpak good, so everyone must use it", which is nice, but it's naïve. Flatpak is ok, but it has usability problems, and since you want people to use it, usability is kind of important. It also introduces a frustrating divide from a user perspective. The idea that "desktop apps" should be installed via Flatpak, and everything else with a proper package manager is madness from a user's perspective. I don't understand how you can't see that, but you're going to have to accept it 'cause newsflash: not everyone thinks like you.
Finally, packaging for Flatpack is a Pain In The Ass. I say this as someone who's tried it. The build system is clearly biased toward particular use cases and particular languages, which is great if you're in that camp, but for everyone else it comes across as impractical for the intended purpose.
So yeah, it's great that this is important to you. Go ahead and develop the shit out of Flatpak, and maybe even work on the user experience some more. I'll keep having a look from time to time, but for now, it's not happening, and this attitude of yours, that the rest of us will just "need to adapt" to your preferred way of working... if I wanted that I'd use a Mac. GTFO.
I wasn't talking about Slack. Actually, my worst Flatpak experience was with PyCharm. The fs limitations mean it couldn't see files like ${HOME}/.config/git/ignore or load up my shell environment inside the IDE. It's basically a neutered version of the app because someone decided to draw the security/usability line too far in the one direction.
It's fine if you think that's a good idea, but as a user, the choice of packaging means it's not useful to me, so I won't use it.
That's an understandable goal, but as a user, breaking the user experience when I go to send a file to someone only to find that I can't even see it in some apps is a deal breaker. If the app can't be trusted to do that, I won't use it.
Personally I install it with pacman and generally avoid Flatpaks due to annoying problems I've had with it limiting filesystem access in the past. My biggest problem is that it seems to "forget" that I'm logged in if I don't use it regularly, meaning I have to regularly re-auth it on my desktop since I use it infrequently there.
If you're in Europe, FOSDEM is this weekend. You can show up, buy all kinds of merch direct from the people who wrote that thing you use every day, and you can even buy them a drink.
I'll be the first to admit that I (and most of my field) is grossly overpaid when you compare what we do to more valuable work like nursing and teaching, but I'm not going to demand a 50% pay cut to stand in solidarity with the nation's nurses, especially when I know that everyone else in my field wouldn't be doing the same.
This dude with the super villain moustache straight-up said that his salary was exorbitant and unreasonable, and he did it on national television. I think that's pretty great. We should be having an open conversation in this country about compensation and working toward something like a wealth cap.
My only criticism is that this guy didn't use this opportunity to go that bit further. I mean, he's half way there already being critical of his own income, why not go all the way and say something baller like "No one should be allowed to make more than £100k/year"?
It's probably because he doesn't actually see a problem with his compensation, but either way, I think conversations like this should be encouraged and journalists need to pursue the topic of a wealth cap when situations like this present.
Ubuntu. They've managed the worst of both worlds: like Debian, everything is old (though admittedly not as old), but unlike Debian, everything is broken/buggy/flakey. It's the old-and-busted distro that I'm routinely told is "the only Linux we support".
Daniel Quinn @ danielquinn @lemmy.ca Posts 12Comments 662Joined 2 yr. ago
Very reminiscent of Mass Effect's Reapers