Skip Navigation

Posts
49
Comments
647
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • "Saako vähemmän kontekstia?"

    Mutta hei, ei tullut tuomiota, mikä tarkoittaa oikeiston mukaan sitä että ihan turhaan siinä oksentelet kun kaikki oli laillista, ja sitäpaitsi ne tytöt sekä Hesari ja oletettavasti myös poliisi valehteli koska vasemmiston ajojahti.

    Rydmanin kaltaset niljaiset ihmisperseet ja tukijajoukkonsa saa kyl pienen ihmisen välillä toivomaan, että internetin välityksellä voisi puukottaa jotakuta kurkkuun.

  • Did you read anything I said past that part or did you just want to get your petulant downvote in?

    I literally fucking said the boom's idiotic and there's a lot of problems with the technology, but just blindly pretending everything about it is shit is as idiotic as is pretending they're the good for everything. What is it with people's inability to have a honest fucking argument; "their 'sample data' is nonsense" is bullshit and you fucking know it. "Sample data" isn't even a fucking thing in this context.

  • I know hating ChatGPT is trendy, but while I think this AI boom is absolutely idiotic and LLMs aren't suitable for a lot of the things people try to use them for, I think there's a real tendency for people to make it seem like everything about them is garbage. Pretending that even their training data is "nonsense" is just silly

  • Yeah it'd be a waste of your time and energy.

    I had two friends recently suddenly drop into the conspiracist nutball rabbit hole, and I really don't have much enthusiasm to see them anymore. Last time I saw them they grilled me on the moon landings, and absolutely nothing I said meant anything to them. If I hesitated even for a second when answering one of their "accusations" they took it as proof that I'm the one who doesn't know what they're talking about – couldn't be that I was trying to think of a way of explaining something to people who clearly aren't familiar with the subject at all beyond whatever idiotic conspiracy garbage they've consumed.

  • (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻

    ┬─┬ ノ( ゜-゜ノ)

  • Ah right I get you, a "how is he still kicking" instead of "why hasn't someone fed him to a wood chipper"

  • But! "Abysmal" comes from "abysm":

    abysm

    | əˈbɪz(ə)m |

    noun literary

    an abyss: the abysm from which nightmares crawl.

  • Most pleasant and humane conservative.

  • I keep repeating this, but "moderate" conservatives are mythical creatures much like unicorns or ethical billionaires.

    Every conservative either outright supports authoritarianism, or would be fine with it as long as it's their side in power because of course the leopards won't eat their faces. "Moderates" will always choose co-operation with literal fascists over co-operation with the left because they ultimately have fewer ideological disagreements with them – just look at what's happening here in Europe with all the "moderates" lining up to kiss Meloni's ring (remember that her FdI party is literally a descendant of the original Fascist Party and multiple of its members including Meloni have voiced admiration of Mussolini)

  • Bring Jeb back alive

  • Clearly "the system" isn't capable of handling the threat of right-wing extremism and something needs to be done, but anybody murking Trump would probably make things worse, not better. He'd become a conservative martyr, and they could point to his death and say "see, we told you they're violent" and use it to deepen hatred and oppression. This is what happened after the failed assassination attempt on Robert Fico

  • I just think it's hilarious that this comment is "Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra" with emojis

  • That legitimately sounds delicious. Somebody needs to open a Polish-Chinese fusion restaurant

  • Imgur was over capacity, my Lemmy instance doesn't allow uploading gifs or mp4s, so I just picked a random gif hosting service and called it a day

  • Whether that manifesto's "reliable", well, we'll have to see. That recent immunity move by the SC is already a big step in the direction that Project 2025 wants to take the US in with their "unitary executive theory" bullshit – everything doesn't hinge on Trump.

    Far as Trump's disavowals go, I'll believe it when I see it – that man lies as easily as he breathes. I'll be happily surprised if it does turn out he wasn't lying, but that's not going to be my default assumption. And it's not like Project 2025 hinges on his enthusiastic support of the Project, just its goals – if Trump gets elected he is the one choosing which recommendations he'll follow, and I don't find it very believable that he wouldn't be interested in eg. expanding executive power.

    Lastly, that "Washington Post report" is another one of those vague articles featuring "according to sources familiar".

    That's going to be what they publish every time the sources don't want anyone to know it was them, but it's not like the reporters don't know their sources or don't vet them –this "anonymous source bad" trope frankly reeks of the classic populist Lying press / Lügenpresse rhetoric. I really don't understand how people think things should work if anonymous sources are bad

  • However, this does not apply to US soil. One of the benefits of state sovereignty is that federal armed forces can't operate on US soil

    From the Project 2025 wiki page:

    In November 2023, The Washington Post reported that deploying the military for domestic law enforcement under the Insurrection Act of 1807 would be an "immediate priority" upon a second Trump inauguration in 2025. That aspect of the plan was being led by Jeffrey Clark, a contributor to the project and a former official in the Trump Department of Justice (DOJ). Clark is a senior fellow at the Center for Renewing America, a Project 2025 partner. The plan reportedly includes directing the DOJ to pursue those considered by Trump as disloyal or a political adversary

  • Oh yeah, extensions which make them non-regular definitely can make it possible, but just because it's now somewhat possible with some regex engines doesn't mean it's a good idea

  • I see no downsides to this