No, they don't want people who hate Elon like another commenter suggested – the idea that a scammer would think that the people who are most likely to fall for their Elon crypto scam are the haters and not the people who are uncontrollably guzzling his cum is frankly bizarre.
Scammers want to attract people who are gullible and stupid enough that they don't see they're getting scammed.
People who are "worked up" about Elon aren't going to watch a scam video that purports to be by Elon / SpaceX / whatever and go "by golly, I clicked on this link because I get so worked up about Elon, but he's saying he can make me rich. Maybe I've been wrong about him the whole time and I need to check this thing out?"
Somebody commented earlier about Cummins being a funny name. Turns out there's a company called Cummins that, among other things, makes generators, so it's just the classic "thingamabob powered by {CORPORATION_NAME}" that you see in marketing speak all the time.
There aren't enough role models teaching them that you can be a man without being toxic to women.
Is this really the problem, or is the problem that the sort of people with role models like Tate are the sort of people who wouldn't gravitate towards non-toxic role models in the first place?
Because if it's actually true that there are very few good male role models to choose from, I'm not entirely sure what that tells us about men, exactly.
Seems no, to me: a human lawyer wouldn't, for instance, make up case law that doesn't exist. AI has done that one already. If it had even the most basic understanding of what the law is and does, it would have known not to do that.
LLMs don't have an understanding of anything, but that doesn't mean all AI in perpetuity is incapable of having an understanding of eg. what the law is. Edit: oh and also, it's not like human lawyers are incapable of mistakenly "inventing" case law just by remembering something wrong.
As to whether human intelligence is statistics, well… our brains are neural networks, and ultimately neural networks – whether made from meat or otherwise – are "just statistics." So in a way I guess our intelligence is "just statistics", but honestly the whole question is sort of missing the point; the problem with AI (which right now really means LLMs) isn't the fact that they're "just statistics", and whether you think human intelligence is or isn't "just statistics" doesn't really tell you anything about why our brains perform better than LLMs
But it is, and it always has been. Absurdly complexly layered statistics, calculated faster than a human could.
Well sure, but as someone else said even heat is statistics. Saying "ML is just statistics" is so reductionist as to be meaningless. Heat is just statistics. Biology is just physics. Forests are just trees.
dactylotheca @ dactylotheca @suppo.fi Posts 49Comments 647Joined 1 yr. ago
Yeah they should have just checked his LinkedIn page