The connectome is a map of individual neurones. The projectome is a map of how larger regions interconnect. Particularly the relative strength of the links.
It's the difference between a detailed road map vs the relative road capacity between countries. It cuts out a lot of fine detail to see larger patterns. Both are useful, but in different ways.
In our defence, most of that is legacy from the post war rebuild (copper shortages etc). The modern regs are comparable or better than a lot of places.
There's enough of the dodgy stuff around that it needs to be accounted for, but it's being phased out as new stuff it built or renovated.
Discworld is one of those series that shows that a good book doesn't necessarily make good tv. You would definitely want writers who can stick to the spirit, while diverging where necessary.
There's also the possibility of telling whole new stories in the Discworld. It has a LOT of milage as a backdrop for other stories.
Some of our sockets now have interlock type slats. Not only do you need to insert the earth pin first, but you also have to insert the live and neutral together. Now, even if you wedge the earth open, you still can't insert a fork into the live.
He's likely trying to throw down as many speed bumps as possible. Individually, they won't do much. Each will act as a distraction, a slight delay. Against most people in his position, they would be useless. Trump isn't most people however. He will bite and get distracted by the chew toy. It's likely about all Biden can do to limit the damage a little.
The pyramids were built by skilled labour. One of the options for paying taxes was to work on public works. It was also seen as a religious event, akin to modern missionaries.
It's likely a scale thing. A satellite gives full coverage, but it's working at a large scale, with a long time lag. A plane is more local, with less time lag, but still quite a large scale. A drone is hyper local, with almost no time lag. Depending who is asking, all 3 can be extremely useful.
I can unfortunately see where communication could break down. Local firefighters wanted hyper local information. They didn't coordinate with the larger effort, and so the accident could have happened.
I don't know about the states, but in the UK. A police force decided to operate a drone for their own use. The CAA tried to politely educate them on the rules, and were, effectively told to eff off. A £35,000 ($43,000) fine was quite an effective slap on the wrist.
Detailed fire tracking. From the ground, it's difficult to tell if the fires is wrapping around you etc. By getting a bit of altitude, you can see what's going on, and act accordingly.
I've got 1 dream check, that's fairly reliable, when I need it. I check my back pocket for "heavy weapons". Basically, think cartoon "hammer space". It's an almost unnoticeable check when awake, that doesn't do anything. In a dream state however, an ak47, or a bazooka is to hand.
This is particularly effective against nightmares. My subconscious happily accepts that I can pull whatever cartoon doodad I need out of my back pocket. This let's me jam nightmares. I've not had one since I trained myself to do this a couple of decades back.
The 1 trick to note, you need to "believe" on some level that it will work. It's akin to accepting a film. You know they are just actors and CGI, but you accept it as real. This belief gives it power in your dreams.
It was when she started on the hormones. Apparently, it wasn't surprising to her friends going through the same process.
Unfortunately, I only know 1 trans person well enough to ask them about it. Also, considering it's a binary (either men feel less, or are better at containing it), I would be surprised if it goes the opposite ways when transitioning.
It's not a scientific study however, just an interesting and relevant observation.
We can never truly say for sure, but it's the closest situation that can give a side by side comparison. Either testosterone allows better emotional inhibition, or estrogen reduces it. The main point is that men aren't emotionless. Our emotions are just as strong as women's, we are just better able to contain them (for better or worse).
This sort of situation is how I knew my wife was/is a keeper. When I was pushed to the point where my negative emotions got too much, she was there for me. She didn't shy away, but stepped in to help and support me.
In many of my previous relationships, showing negative emotions was lethal to their feelings. I could be happy, or stoic, but never upset or depressed.
On a side note, I had a chat with a trans friend once, regarding emotions. When they transitioned, the intensity of their emotions didn't change much. However, their ability to contain them plummeted. Basically, men and women feel emotions similarly. Men are just a lot more able to bottle them up.
"In theory, there's no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there's a huge difference."
America (and Europe) have a lot of theoretical knowledge. How that plays out in practice is another story. Ukraine has a lot of practical experience. They know which corners can be cut, without losing anything, and which are critical. Lessons payed for in blood.
It's interesting to look at what is actually required to be a technological species (assuming they develop it themselves).
Dextrus Manipulators.
To make technology, you need something to manipulate the world reliably. Hands are the most obvious method, but not the only ones. Octopus tenticles could also likely fill the roll.
Social groups and communication.
Developments are useless, if they can't be passed on to the next generation, or shared around. Technology requires building on the work of others.
Brain development.
There needs to be something to drive early brain development. With humans, it was likely sexual preferences. It could otherwise become a chicken and the egg type problem.
Generalist.
A specialist species will tend to lean into their strengths. There's far less need for intelligence when you have big claws, or heavy armour already. This also applies to size. Too big, or too small tends to specialise in a why the precludes other developments.
There are several species on earth that hit some of these points, but not all. E.g. Dolphins hit all but the manipulator issue. Octopus are completely solitary. Many mammals hit all but brain development, and crabs overspecialise.
I could easily see a small tweak leading to a radically non human technological intelligence. That is also based only on what has already developed and stabilised in the earth's biome. The cambrian explosion showed that far more body forms are at least viable.
I personally drive a van, most of the time. Checking over my shoulder is a waste of time. What I do need is situational awareness. I'm aware of where my blind spots are, both absolute (e.g. directly behind my back bumper) and partial (e.g. the spot down my side).
I try and keep an awareness of everything entering and leaving my blind spots. I also do 2 checks of all spots that could have problems when manoeuvring. It's alarming how often a small car or bike can slip through blind spots, when you're doing your checks.
Basically, know your vehicle, and do what's appropriate to keep everyone safe.
Room is too well insulated and sealed. Once the bedroom door is closed, the air exchange is too low. I'm planning to fit a heat exchanging fan system next year to permanently fix it.
Opening a window isn't as bad as it first seems. Most of the heat in a home (at least a brick one) is in the structure. Change the air, close the window, and it will rapidly warm up again. It's only leaving it open for longer periods that cool it down.
If you've not got one, I would highly recommend getting an air quality meter.
I had this issue last night, awake randomly at 2-3am. When I checked, the air quality was terrible. (It's bespoke scale put it at 10 out of 100) after opening a window and letting it improve, I happily drifted back off.
It turned out I didn't wake up randomly, I was dragged awake from a light sleep due to the air quality plummeting. It won't apply to everyone, but it's worth checking if it's a common problem.
(For reference, 10% air was CO2 of 2360ppm, and VOCs at 5000ppm with 80% humidity. Fresh air is CO2<500, VOCs<100)
The connectome is a map of individual neurones. The projectome is a map of how larger regions interconnect. Particularly the relative strength of the links.
It's the difference between a detailed road map vs the relative road capacity between countries. It cuts out a lot of fine detail to see larger patterns. Both are useful, but in different ways.