curiousaur @ curiousaur @reddthat.com

Posts

2

Comments

879

Joined

2 yr. ago

No, Biden is complicit. If enough voters make it clear he has two choices: abandon Israel or we'll elect Trump, then it's his fault when Trump is elected for continuing to support genocide.

Politicians work for us, they have a responsibility. Not the other way around.

Its just an alcoholic goodberry. Instant party refreshments. Finish a battle, pop! Cold beverages.

With HL3, L4D3, TF3, Portal 3

Genocide is bad enough to outweigh all the good.

That comes after the election.

Stops trying to take attention from the genocide he's actively supporting with our tax dollars.

I love Fury Road. It's a spectacular film. This "sequel" just looks bad. You can tell it's green screened, when the on destination actual vehicles is so much of why Fury Road was great. The acting and writing seem bad. And that's just from the trailer that's supposed to make you want to watch it.

That would make a great movie premise. Opening scene the klan is doing some occult ceremony.

Cheers. 🍻

Exactly correct. We need to let them all fail.

So they took the trending naval combat, then themed it mortal engines. Could be great. Trailer looks boring.

You ever raked an acre? Or three? Ten?

You don't have to consent to becoming a gay folk hero.

You're talking sheer pregmatics here? Awesome, now you're speaking my language.

Celebrate her relationship. Turn her into a gay folk hero for hooking up with women despite the upbringing / programming.

So you're saying she should not be having bisexual threesomes? I think that's fucked up, let her have whatever adult sex she wants.

No it's not valid. That's litterally the tu quoque fallacy a form of ad hominem.

People are attacking her for having bisexual threesoms. That's a shitty thing to do. Let her have all the sex she wants with whoever she wants, it's none of our business.

That's a fallacy. If I say it's bad to kill people, then I kill someone, was I wrong when I said it's bad?

What someone does is separate from the validity of what they say.

It's Man of Science, not male scientist. It's right there in the post.

You just defined ad hominem in the same sentence you said it's not.

If they are making bad policy, then focus on that because it's bad. Not because the individual doesn't actually follow it.