Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)CR
Posts
0
Comments
462
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Random chance means that every few years, somewhere in the world, some medical professional will be present at a series of unusual deaths. They end up in prison even though there's no other evidence.

    This seems totally plausible, but I've never heard of it happening I don't think. Do you have any cases you can point out? I'm having trouble finding a decent search term.

    I'm trying to find out what the actual evidence against Letby was.

    So am I, now, after reading your comment. I found this which gives the list:

    • Her 'presence' around the time of each collapse (how many infant deaths happened during her employment for which she was NOT present?)
    • she stole documents from the hospital, including a small number of documents with the names of babies she killed (probably a crime in itself, but fewer than 9% of the documents she had taken related to the babies in any way, so this could well be a bad habit)
    • The post-it note (written after arrest, could well be nothing more than the frantic thoughts of someone in terror)
    • The fact that it's extremely difficult to prove she injected air (seems to work both ways)

    So far, I'm not convinced. None of that evidence seems solid enough. Its worrying, not just because an innocent person may have just lost everything, but also because if there's a systemic failure then creating a scapegoat is a surefire way to ensure it continues to happen.

    That said, I know only what's been reported, I wasn't there and I don't know everything. I want to believe the justice system is working properly and the people in full possession of the facts (judge, jury, barristers) made the right decision. I'm a little bit less inclined that way at the moment after hearing about the recent exoneration of Andrew Malkinson.

  • Well that is the very pinnacle of discourse my friend. Thank you very much for being intelligent enough to do it and brave enough to say it. I like to think I do the same when I encounter a sound argument. Are you a scientist by any chance?

    Edit to add:

    the elderly professor took the American by the hand and said — with passion — ‘My dear fellow, I wish to thank you. I have been wrong these fifteen years. We clapped our hands red.

    ~Richard Dawkins

  • What opinion exactly? You've only stated that you agree with someone else's.
    If you think that subjecting prisoners of certain crimes to inhumane conditions is a good idea, then it's a simple refutation: the justice system is not perfect and people who are innocent WILL be subjected to that treatment on occasion, which is unacceptable - a similar argument to the one against capital punishment.
    If you want to get into a debate on rehabilitation vs. punishment then that's another matter.

  • I'm going to disagree with you. What else would you expect? I could also challenge you to think carefully about the consequences that this kind of policy would have, but I have only a smidgen of hope that you actually would.

  • Exactly right. We need to root out how this happened if we want to stop it happening again. That would probably include an honest long look at the NHS in general and whatever went on in her mind in particular. It's never going to be as simple as "this woman's a monster". We need to know what impulses she felt and what justifications she told herself, knowing it was the worst kind of wrong. And how did she get into a position where it was possible. The families deserve answers and we all need to know it can't happen again.

  • I'm sorry I have you the impression that I gave a shit what you thought of my opinion on the death penalty. Let me be more clear: I Do Not Give A Shit About What You Think.

    Am I clear enough?

    Ok...Then why are you posting your opinion on a public forum?
    What I think isn't that important. Do you have anything of any substance to say about what I have written?
    Your support for the death penalty is wrong morally, and incorrect rationally. That's not my opinion, it's just counting.

  • If you're talking about Westminster, then I don't agree. The measure of success for a democracy must be how well it represents the people. At this, Westminster has failed and continues to fail. The country itself has been very successful, historically. Its common people however have been subjugated and oppressed.

  • Antennas

    You're selling sexism
    You're selling racism
    You're selling anything you get your fucking hands on
    An understanding, you got a plan in a
    Presentation to advertisers who demand it
    When you plan that
    Your antennas are pointed in the right direction
    You make a deal in any situation
    So with no evacuation
    Let California fall into the fucking ocean
    Oh they talk to ya, oh you're the town man
    High profile Hollywood scum-bag
    It's a done deal, signed and sealed
    Deal makers making it all happen
    When you plan that
    Your antennas are pointed in the right direction
    You make a dead in any situation
    So with no evacuation
    Let California fall into the fucking ocean
    Let California fall into the fucking ocean!
    Let California fall into the fucking ocean!
    Let California fall into the fucking ocean!!!

    -Tim Armstrong/Rancid