Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)CR
Posts
0
Comments
462
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Now-corrupt UK Government Continues to be Corrupt.

    The UK government continues to be a corrupt version of itself, maintaining the veneer of honest public service only through blatant, continuous and disheartening lies. The British public are no longer surprised by these revelations, having become desensitised to this sort of thing over the past decade. The only surprising revelations would now be cases where an elected official were to resign if caught with their hands in the biscuit tin, rather than claiming that:

    • it wasn't me
    • the biscuits are for me to take
    • there is no biscuit tin
    • my stealing biscuits is in the public interest
    • it's your fault I had to take biscuits

    Or some such bollocks, all while continuing to stuff their faces with Hobnobs in front of our eyes.

    Politicians have always been awful, but the lot we've got now are worse than any in living memory.

  • The focus isn't on that though, and while you and The Leader of the Free World™ prevaricate and wish for a perfect solution, children are being slaughtered in their thousands. The focus, in my opinion, should be on stopping that slaughter immediately. You know, with a ceasefire or something.

  • Can I ask where you got this info from? The article says the bill is 300 pages long. I'm never getting through all that.

    Edit: the article also claims age verification for porn sites is still in there?

  • Good question! It seems that their comment would only work as an exasperated remark if the level of rape/sexual assault/general disregard for women was higher now than it was when chaperoning and Victorian mores were prevalent, which it is not.
    So we can fairly assume, unless the commenter chooses to clarify, that they were expressing annoyance at the relatively new phenomenon of women being able to retrospectively point the finger at their aggressors.
    A lot of that judgement is based on seeing patterns in the arguments of conservatives and my own parsing of the comment, so it might be wrong and I'm willing to be corrected. It's a genuinely interesting question, because without my experience of the cesspools of the internet which has caused a (reasonable) bias in my thinking, I don't think I would have come to that conclusion. I hope we do hear more from the commenter and can see what exactly they meant.

    Either way, Russell Brand is a diseased penis.

    Edit: oh dear, down voted within 30 seconds of posting this very thoughtful reply! Whatever could that mean?

  • No, you're right. We absolutely need to move forward and progress, especially if that means pseudo-intellectuals have free rein to rape whomever they want, whenever they want. In fact, Jordan Peterson should probably be allowed to genocide anyone with unnatural hair colour, or people who chose their own pronouns!!! Otherwise it's just basically the dark ages all over again, right?

  • Pitbulls are the most deadly breed of dog, to humans. This is a solid concrete fact. There are reasons for this, and evidence to back it up. Your thing about bears is irrelevant, unless those dogs have been proven to be more dangerous to humans than pitbulls, which they haven't.