crandlecan @ crandlecan @mander.xyz

Posts

0

Comments

223

Joined

2 yr. ago

Oopsies 😂

The video: https://youtu.be/ODhNRyjJsl8?feature=shared

A video with the video (longer): https://youtu.be/rjbn7O8K98Q?feature=shared

Who knows 😂

Sorry for the downvote, especially seen that case law hasn't been settled yet nor if your, or my, reasoning is the correct one. I just hate your arguments though it looks like you work as a part-time Dutch judge :))

I'll take it lmao

😂 I'm gonna copy pasta that 😁

Thoughts and prayers 🙏 🌈

🌚

Friend of mine back then bought the T-shirt 😁

But instead he was...? 🧐

As far as my interpretation of the law goes... You can either block your website to all non paying visitors OR you also allow non paying visitors but you are not allowed to blackmail the free visitors to give up their privacy. Either everyone pays, or you have the right to privacy. Otherwise, long term, the internet will become divided and inaccessible to low income households. And that's something the EU definitely doesn't want to happen (net neutrality). I think the Dutch verdicts will be overruled by Europe one of these days... Or years :)

In case Lemmy didn't show my other reply https://mander.xyz/comment/4939010

It's not as clear cut as either of us thinks... To my surprise the Dutch seem to agree with you. But case law is being made as we speak https://consent.guide/cookie-or-pay-walls/

https://consent.guide/cookie-or-pay-walls/ has the latest case law

It's not as clear cut as either of us thinks... To my surprise the Dutch seem to agree with you. But case law is being made as we speak https://consent.guide/cookie-or-pay-walls/

I don't think the European GDPR allows this (forcing ppl to pay for privacy).

🤯

😂

There's a legal market for it as far as I recall correctly

🤡

🤢🤮