cotlovan @ cotlovan @lemm.ee

Posts

0

Comments

71

Joined

2 yr. ago

I agree with that part. What I don't agree with is corpos posing as holders of truth and bastions of morality.

Wow, all the bsky lovers are now facing the reality. None of the corpos have user's interest in mind. They only care about numbers: number of active users' data that they can sell to the highest bidder.

You just proved my point, all these people in the west are "supporting the LGBT movement" because it's trendy. No one cares about these minorities in the middle east, where being gay is punished by death.

Blackrock is pushing DEI because it's the new popular thing. I never said that Fink believes in it, but still he's the one "forcing behaviors".

Haha, which rule exactly did my comment break, mister Moderator?

Shiny trends like pride parades, drag shows in schools, rainbow company logos

Larry Fink would be one of them.

I'm talking about present day, not about someone's forefathers. Today people are separated and judged based on their skin color and their preferred sexual partners. If it wasn't right 100 years ago, I don't see how it is OK now.

Why must there be special places, devided by sexual orientation and skin color? Are non-white/non straight people less smart so they need special slots? How is that "equality"?

Also I'm sorry, but as a non native English speaker I fail to understand what you meant by the last paragraphs. Also, I don't know your name and I'm not sure I care.

That the left is "more educated"? I'd press "doubt" on that. Radical lefties are just as closed minded as the radical right. Supporting the new shiny trend doesn't make one smarter.

Bruh, the whole west participated in china's censorship, from Cisco to Siemens. But I guess it's pupular to hate on Zucc now.

Bsky is just Twitter, 10 years ago.

Hahaha, "the left are more educated" hahaha. Bruh, this sub is just filled to the brim with radical leftists.

The world is healing.

Speaking about false equivalence, how did you came to the conclusion that just because I don't find a corporation removing gender stuff from their policies relevant from a technological stand point - makes me an LGBT hater? You seem to already have made your mind, you probably did assume that I'm a trump supporter who wanna see gays being hanged, even though I was saying that I expected more tech and less gender politics from this sub.

There are a lot of subs dedicated to LGBT, I came here for tech. Which sub would in your opinion be more appropriate for tech talk if not this one?

Of course everyone is allowed to speak their mind. But being called names for not supporting a particular point of view sounds like hate speech to me, wouldn't you agree?

Sure, you can't always separate the technology from the politics, my issue was that this is what most posts around here are about. I took a look and most content comes a few accounts, and it's always about the "nazi this" and "fascist that". Is that really only thing that happens in the tech space, what Musk said and what YouTube changed in their policy?

Your reply and your up votes just prove what I said. You're not allowed to disagree with the rhetoric around here.

I know exactly what fascism means, and often what the left is doing aligns better with the definition than what the right is doing. Also, let's not forget that "nazi" is a short form for "national socialism"

As i signed up for this sub, I thought I'd be reading about technology. Actually, it seems that people here are more concerned about companies not sticking to the far left ideology, so naturally they call everyone nazis and fascists, without ever knowing what those words even mean.

Just because someone doesn't want to play the gender tip toe dance, doesn't mean they're nazis. But I guess that's not something that this sub is ready to face.