Skip Navigation

Posts
1
Comments
95
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Christ, do this many people really find iso8601 hard to read? It’s the date and the time with a T in the middle.

  • Using a TUI however makes you an absolute beast mode rockstar engineer

  • This is what life is when all viable phones are made by two giant tech companies.

  • It’s chromium

  • Watching the decline of the internet in real-time is fucking depressing. How long before the FTC lets google “verify the integrity” of every data center in the US, completely eliminating all hope? Doesn’t even sound that crazy anymore.

  • Packages often have recursive dependencies. There are some conscious packages that go the extra mile to not have any dependencies, but it’s very rare in the JavaScript ecosystem. Welcome to hell. You can at least use dev dependencies to avoid downloading them in CI etc., but that’s about it.

  • You can also just… pay for it? I give money to JetBrains in exchange for incredibly useful tools. It’s okay to pay for things.

  • Stop trying to make assistants. That includes Siri. The ML integrations like making text selectable in images is fucking amazing, invest only there please.

  • if
    big company
    then
    because money

    zero part of this is good will.

  • I’m sure plenty of the offenders are legitimate, but it’s completely safe to check private key pairs into code, or to bake them in to images. It entirely depends on what the key pairs are used for. Very common to include key pairs for development/test environments, for example. If it’s a production secret, of course you don’t do this.

  • I’m with you, it’s just Cool to hate on Apple or whatever.

  • Wish I could play again for the first time, enjoy 🥲

  • It’s here, it’s there, it’s everywhere. The problem with replacing things that work with something “better” is that “better” is subjective, so you end up with a new “better” way every few years, and maintaining existing systems becomes a god awful slog. See the JavaScript ecosystem.

    The bash I wrote 10 years ago still works today, and it will still work in 10 more years. The same bash will very likely work on your computer, on a remote server, etc. This is the power of not chasing “better” all the time.

    Try running a Ruby or Node program from 10 years ago today on your computer. Now, try running it on a random Linux server.

    Please do not take this as a slight against Ruby or Node, or any other high level programming language. Bash compared to those is simply apples and oranges, they are not the same thing.

    By all means, if you have a project that requires a Ruby runtime anyway, write operational scripts with Ruby, run them with Rake, etc.

    Want a portable script that doesn’t depend on a complex runtime? Use bash.

    If bash is too limiting, use Perl. No, seriously. Perl is fine. It is about as ubiquitously available as bash, and the standard library likely has what you need to get the job done. People blindly dismiss Perl because some blog post told them to, usually in the context of writing application code. You’re not writing application code, you’re writing scripts. Would you write an application with bash? No.

  • Feels like this will be a very common occurrence with people rushing to build and use new apps, and host new servers. There are plenty of positives to fediverse vs centralized, but it doesn’t come without negatives.

  • Did you know you can just play and enjoy games because you want to, and because you like them?

  • Been playing Halls of Torment, best $4 I’ve ever spent.

  • Daww, this is MY cat Willow, 13, needy, and adorable as well! Twins!