Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)CO
correcthorsedickbatterystaple @ correcthorsedickbatterystaple @kbin.social
Posts
0
Comments
63
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • were the kind and caring people more kind and more caring than the people in your community who spend their time and resources in bettering the community? did they shine and/or were their intentions better than volunteers in your community?

  • i'm sorry but i have to be pedantic here. it's not how you get your revenue it's the good or service you provide.

    magazines are not ad companies. TV channels are not ad companies. the source of your revenue does not make you a company in a sector of that source.

  • If you wait until someone is about to die

    yeah, if you push someone out of the way of a vehicle, you could say (accurately) that they were about to die but now they're right as rain. but when someone is about to die because of an ever increasingly worsening medical scenario that unfolded predictably (that's a big part of it - the medical knowledge we possess being able to prevent the condition)... it's not like being on death's door will suddenly mean you're back to normal without great effort, cost, suffering, and risk.

    imagine applying that to any other medical condition "yeah your head hurts / it's difficult to breathe / your toe is green / etc, but you aren't about to die yet. come back when you're brought in an ambulance"

  • not disagreeing with your first paragraph, but sort of adding that it's not a desire to control women's bodies - it's a desire to control everything. the society they want requires a "traditional nuclear family" run by a patriarch. a woman's body is one part of this and is the means not the end.

    i am disagreeing with your second paragraph as it was the ghoul in the senate who placed 3 fascists on the supreme court.

  • actually...a lot of people need to do something. which is the purpose behind talking about it first. getting support and consensus for possibly making a case can lead to cases actually being made. it's not like on TV where the district attourney of america walks up to the judge of america and convicts him. educating people why there are arguments and convincing them they are powerful don't happen overnight.