nature is not exclusively kind or collaborative, nature is logical, and the vast majority of creeds in question violate this law and will see the consequences for doing so, either in their personal life dissatisfaction, or by means of meeting problems they cant pass by means of flawed world understanding :)
im stating that the hypothesis stage can be the natural truth because the natural truth is observable, you must understand that the vast majority of inventions have followed their hypothesis, they all were conceptualised in this manner and this is the reason why the average layman cannot invent anything nowadays
scientific thinking is inherently that of natural law, which inherently is religious (when known correctly), in reality it must be known that the natural world is observable through conceptualisation, i urge you to step from society with a written method of recording yourself, think of all you can think about in the topic you're curious in, and thoughts will flow through you
damn right it was hypothesised and theorised, both of which happened prior to the viewing of an atom, it's because the natural world is observable through conceptualisation
my ancestors, armed with knowledge of the natural world, created the truest religion, practically all relevant inventions between 600BC and 0AD, and have survived for over 3000 years due to their understanding of natural law, yours are american :)
the structure of the atom pales in comparison to relevant information about the world in any case, plus if you paid attention in science class, you'd know that the atom was theorised before it was proven, only goes to show you that you may conceptualise the natural law without necessarily laying eyes upon it :)
natural law is not chosen, it pre-exists everything, and considering you seem to lack any inheritable intellect, i can tell that my kids will probably be the ones having to put up with the half-brained offspring of your kind, regardless, i have nothing to fear against people who cant even understand basic logic, you could be outwitted by a bent sickle
you sound like someone who hasnt thought in their life, besides, you use full grammar to compensate for a lack of written content, i have nothing to fear against weird automatons of the human nature like you
i encourage learning, go somewhere quiet and away from the lies of society, bring a method of written recording of your choice, and note all the things that come to your mind, focus on the area in question that you wish to conceptualise information about, and it may come to you, more efficiently and clearly when you know what you are doing well
estimation is not the same as providing an exact number, i thought someone who lied about having moral truth would know this? do you now know that ~ means "estimated"? you truly do need to clear your mind and look at the world logically for once, you'll realise things that will change you for the better
you follow your party-owners like a good slave who knows not to rebel against invented law, who is blinded to the glory of natural law, and people like you are the reason such conditions are brought upon the world :)
i have many times, observe them within the world already instead of asking things that cant be taught, to be taught, it wont achieve anything, take a notepad and walk through a forest and you will gain insights with a newfound clear mindset, because society is fake and it's laws are made up in comparison to the unchanging and eternal glory of the natural law :)
i said ~400% as it was an estimate based on the maximum perceivable related information, your entire world view is made up considering it does not align with natural law :)
natural law is inherently the religion of the world, and it is the truth, you don't need microscopes or technology to observe the truth of the world, just your mind, experience, a want to logically comprehend the world, it all would come to you provided you are wise in those capacities
you need to immerse yourself within the world to know how it operates, and it's not possible to put numbers to truth, to audit such a thing is useless and impractical when we can all focus on actually spreading the truth rather than asking who knows it
those natural laws merely teach the fact that everyone must recognise that there are insurmountable opponents that must be protected against, the natural law more also refers to natural processes as well as logical processing, on top of this, a religious view of the world is a natural one, the natural world's logic is observable and to describe it as a laymen's work would be at the very least a grave insult
look outside, it might be hard, mr. wannabe-FOSS reddit addict, but nature has it's ways of conveying truth to you, and you need to actively seek it, no amount of my words can truly teach you until you witness
nature is not exclusively kind or collaborative, nature is logical, and the vast majority of creeds in question violate this law and will see the consequences for doing so, either in their personal life dissatisfaction, or by means of meeting problems they cant pass by means of flawed world understanding :)