Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)CO
Posts
0
Comments
1,869
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • I was on the founder plan for a while because 50/year to keep an eye on the state of the tech wasn't a huge deal, and there was plenty of stuff my MacBook wasn't really powerful enough for but could tolerate the lag.

    But the whole log-in process was way too much of a barrier for me to actually use it routinely.

  • It was wider, longer, and those bars were about the same size, but the pro was 3 instead of 2 compared to the original non slim.

    The implied uncertainty was the noise part. Neither was enough to really pay attention to in a living room type environment, so I have no idea.

  • Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • It sets an absolutely obscene precedent that a government can globally restrict information. Even global terrible actors like Russia and China haven't succeeded at that.

    Yes, that precedent is 1000 orders of magnitude more harm than India losing access (which they won't, because the entirety of Wikipedia is open source and would be mirrored in the country instantly. But even if they actually would, it is literally impossible to get anywhere near the harm of the precedent this sets).

  • Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • They not only can, trivially. They unconditionally must.

    It is not possible to ever be a reputable organization ever again if you have to choose between censoring content globally for an authoritarian government and shutting down in that country, and censoring content globally is something they genuinely consider. Open, fact based information is their entire reason for existing.

  • Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • No, I have no interest in digging through their history. But it's less than trivial to do. Any random no name site can do it in 5 minutes with any source of the geo-mapping information, with virtually no knowledge required. It is not work.

    GDPR can do literally nothing but block any site that doesn't have finances under their jurisdiction, and they shouldn't be able to. No one else will enforce their fines for them. It's no different than Russia fining Google more money than exists. You can't just magically rob someone because you're a country.

  • Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Yes, they do. They've done it in the past.

    It literally doesn't matter what Indian courts rule. Being banned from India is orders and orders of magnitude more acceptable than blocking a single article anywhere else on the planet. It single handedly eliminates all of their credibility.

    India isn't capable of enforcing fines against an organization that doesn't operate in their country and there's no chance a US court will enforce such an unhinged judgement. They can't be forced to pay.