Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)CO
Posts
7
Comments
616
Joined
6 mo. ago

  • I can tell you straight up, the people living in RVs are not working 2 jobs in the US.

    If we want to talk trailer parks, odds are they're still not working 2 jobs and if they are, they are going to have access to way more luxuries than rural Russians. Unfortunately, they're still probably not independent enough to avoid paying for things they can get for free, such as digital media.

    There's not much of a comparison to be made, honestly. We have it way better in the US than they have it in Russia.

  • Man, if only you put this much effort into advocating for a modest lifestyle.

    It just goes to show: you don't want to solve these problems because you benefit from them.

    You're also just straight up lying at this point. It's crazy how much effort you are putting into this, but it's to be expected because of your cognitive dissonance.

    I'm not going to sift through or quote your bullshit, but we both know that it's there. Keep trying to justify your entitlement, bud. I will always see it for what it is.

  • You're not a minimum wage worker, bub. This is what I mean by why should you get more before others who have less?

    Why should we improve your lifestyle in the big city because you're "too good" to accept a more modest and affordable lifestyle outside of one? You're not willing to invest in making more places livable and improving the lives of others, you're just looking for ways to justify your entitlement to have as much as you can get.

    It's not a big surprise. I don't expect more from people like you at this point. I would be foolish if I did.

  • If democrats really wanted to reduce the disparity in wealth, why would they avoid nominating Bernie twice?

    It was to lower taxes for earners below 400k, tax unrealized gains for the extremely rich, raise taxes for the wealthy in general.

    I've seen this one before! The only part that "gets through" are the tax cuts for those making >$100k per year!

    This is why establishment democrats don't want people like Bernie. They're part of the problem and want to keep profiting off of it.

  • But your suggestion goes squarely in the same hole as “to solve climate change people need to watch their carbon footprint”

    No it doesn't and your analogy only servers to distract and derail because you have no real argument. Try to stay on topic.

    You would directly benefit from appreciating a more-modest lifestyle, and so would your finances. Instead, you're looking for any argument to justify your entitlement and overconsumption because you like nice things too.

    It's okay to be honest about it. Lying and derailing only shows me you're insecure, which is to be expected.

    Look at how much effort you're putting into arguing against spreading out. This is the cultural problem.

  • They don't care about doing any of that, though. They only make promises to get elected and reneg on everything once in office.

    Did any of that happen while Biden was in office? Didn't think so. It's because he's a stooge propped up by the ruling class to make people like you think he has your interests at hand. He doesn't. Establishment democrats do not want to raise taxes on the wealthy. That's a progressive agenda.