Asking a Linux user to recommend a printer
cogman @ cogman @lemmy.world Posts 0Comments 566Joined 2 yr. ago
cogman @ cogman @lemmy.world
Posts
0
Comments
566
Joined
2 yr. ago
People who have previously stated they are atheists but also are christian nationalists because they believe in the "cultural values" it grants. Generally just people with bigotries that line up with christian nationalism's current targets.
"I'm an atheist, but I believe that being gay will destroy society and this CRT stuff will erode the moral values of this nation" that sort of shit. Sam Harris and Jordan Peterson are two that fit right into this mold. Though there have been atheists that have explicitly said they are also christian nationalists, they are just more minor public right wing figures who's names I've already forgotten.
I also didn’t adequately explain that I feel ‘modern’ Christianity has very little to do with the teachings of Christ, much less the content of the Bible even as a whole. It seems it’s much more a justification of their targeted hatred.
Definitely agree there. I think the union of conservative politics and christianity has made both worse.
It's that bigotry and hatred that is the core of christian nationalism and nationalism in general. Having a target to hate is just how these fascist operate. Religion helps to have outgroups to hate, and nationalism exploits that to try and radicalize.
I grew up in a similarly christian conservative community. I think it's a mistake to conflate conservative Christians with christian nationalists (though there is overlap for certain). Several of my very conservative christian family members are disgusted by the christian nationalists.
That's why I don't think it's the christianity driving the nationalism but rather the nationalism driving the christianity. Hence the reason nazis have felt pretty comfortable attending CPAC this year in nazi garb.
There are athiest christian nationalists who will talk about how it's "the culture" that matters and makes a "christian nation" superior to other government forms.
In my home state of Idaho, I see a lot of christian nationists in public office, and they are much more occupied with rooting out "CRT" (re: anything mentioning civil rights and slavery) and LGBT literature than they are focused on "getting prayer back in school" or other overtly "christian" motives.
Hillary lost the election because she's a supremely unlikable person that ran a campaign of "Who else are you going to vote for, Trump?". She ran on a center right political platform (if you can call it that) nearly as derelict as Trump's 2020 platform. She further was pretty insultingly dismissive of the progressive wing of the party. She alienated strong base support when she should have been courting the bernie supporters.
She also did not JUST lose Florida. Further, Biden did not win Florida so that sect of ultra conservative Cubans weren't the deciding factor.
Her lose is also why I fear for 2024. Biden isn't running as bad a campaign as she did, but he is still heavily banking on the "What, you aren't going to let Trump win, right?"
Trump is the new Ronald Reagan of the GOP. The good news about that is the GOP has largely forgotten Reagan at this point. The bad news is they worshiped Reagan for decades after his death. I suspect Trump will largely be treated the same.
You realized Christian Nationalism follows the (misinterpreted and cherry picked) words of someone who died 2000 years ago as their North Star right?
I'll push back on this as I think it's a mistake to view Christian nationalism as a religious thing. It really should be called "White nationalism" because that's more what it means. They'll prop up the bible but they really don't give a fuck about what's in it. Rather, it's just a tool to justify hating Muslims, Jews, and other "brown people" religions. The christian part of christian nationalism is really a tool to sell to grandma "See, we just want a Christian (white) nation. That makes it good because anything christian is automatically good".
Just think of all the valuable work experience these children are missing out on due to the nanny state! /s (the actual thought of rightwing ghouls).
The reason businesses and right wingers are so pro border enforcement is so they can abuse children like this. Threaten deportation and you don't have to follow labor laws.
As to that first point, you know we had AR-15s in the 70s, right?
The other 2 factors are important along with the internet. There may have been less legal barriers to getting an AR-15, that does not mean accomplishing such a task was easy to do. It's not like there were AR-15 ads on TV or in newspapers (well, there may have been, but that would have been highly regional). It's not like every city had an "AR-15" guy in the yellow pages. Legal access hasn't changed, but general access has (particularly to assault rifles).
Regardless, my advocacy is first just starting with laws I think most everyone can agree with, red flag laws. Take away or don't allow the purchase of guns by a domestic abusers or someone with a history of violence. Heck, you could even put a time limit on that stuff like "within the last 7 years".
A ton of these cases are fairly young men (<20). So it would be enough to say "hey, if you are under 25 and your school teachers say 'Do not let this kid in particular have a gun'" then you don't get a gun until you turn 25. Or even an outright ban on ownership for people less than 25 (though that'd be much less popular).
https://www.statista.com/statistics/971544/number-k-12-school-shootings-us-age-shooter/
- Easy access to guns
- The rise of easy access fascist media
- The dissolution of public institutions
It's simply too easy to grab a gun by anyone. Military grade equipment is available to pretty much anyone with a credit card. Then you combine that with a CONSTANT beating drum from people like Alex Jones talking about how much they want crush, destroy, kill their enemies and how corrupt everything is. Then also talking about how people need to rise up and do "something". While also in the same breath telling people to go off their meds and how any sort of treatment for mental disorders is actually poison. Then pair that with the fact that there's pretty much no public infrastructure around public health (thanks Reagan). That means if you are having some sort of mental break down, depression, whatever, if you can't afford the $100s/$1000s of dollars to get regular psychiatric treatment you are basically just going to be untreated. There is also pretty much no safe place to recoup for someone in distress but not at risk of suicide. But even if there were, even if you could afford it, fascists and preachers know that mentally healthy people are harder to grift so they spend all their time demonizing the very help you'd need.
However, not everyone that does this is mentally unwell. Some are just hateful fascists that believe killing gets their hate filled messages into the world. It's why it is irresponsible for any media outlet to publish the name or manifestos of these assholes. Having notorious killers encourages more notorious killers.
The other theory I've heard that makes some sense is lead exposure. From 1925 to about 1976, lead was commonly added to gasoline. Lead is known to cause psychological problems including irritablity and general mood disorders.
Pretty much everyone born during that period was exposed to aerosolized lead.
We may never know exactly how many people israel has butchered over the last 6 months. They are currently planning on building luxury condos over the mass graves of Palestinians.
The 30,000 confirmed dead is almost certainly under counted by a factor of 10x. And the genocide isn't over yet. They are starving the survivors.
The published order is just that. It doesn't explain the why or whatever just "We are reducing the bond amount and not removing the other limitations of the ruling"
No need to be unconvinced, right wingers have explicitly said that's what they want. Benny Shaps recently said something to the effect of "It's unhealthy to retire, everyone that retires ends up dying in a few years. We should all work as long as possible."
Shows how big a lie the election is stolen narrative is.
Jordan, if he were in Congress where he knows he can't be sued for defamation, would have ranted for 20 minutes about Dominion voting machines. But put him in a place where he knows he'd get a defamation lawsuit and all the sudden that congressional fire goes ice cold.
He's a supreme weasel and he covered up rape for years.
Only way to remove her is impeachment. That will never fly as Republican fascists only care about the power she gives and not the Constitution or law.
Clerking for a federal judge is a huge get.
It exposes you to trail, a diversity of legal cases, and how a judge thinks. There aren't a lot of federal judges and the people that clerk for them tend to come from prestigious schools and the top of their class.
Of course, that can't be great when the judge you are working for is a partisan hack who had zero court experience before becoming a judge and did not clerk for a federal judge. She was one of many Trump appointees the bar association ranked as "unqualified".
But she cozied up to the federalist society, which is how she got appointed.
Exactly.
Trump was not wrong that his career with republicans was basically ended. However, Pence was ideally setup to end Trump's career. Had he testified in the impeachment hearing, it would have been DAMN hard for the republicans to spin that as "Oh, opsie, this was just a little crimin'"
Instead, the dipshit thought he'd be loved enough to get a presidential nomination this year (TF?!?!). He's a moron.
other toxins
The vast majority of plastic is carbon, hydrogen, oxygen chains. You can burn those completely such that the only thing released is CO2 and water vapor (just need a hot enough temperature). A scrubber can easily catch anything that breaks that assumption.
If you do an incinerator and don't harvest the power, you can even turn it into just a carbon block by filling the chamber with nitrogen and pumping the temp up to 500C. That'll leave you with carbon blocks and water vapor.
not to create more co2
Plastic decomposes in weird ways that leaving it in the environment is worse than taking it out all together. The reason microplastic is everywhere isn't because we have been burning plastics, it's because we've been (improperly) burying it. I worry a lot more about a leaky landfill letting it's pollutants seep into local water systems.
Further, part of plastic degradation is into those more toxic carbon chains and methane. It's frankly better to just bite the bullet and turn it into CO2.
The sad fact is the best use of used plastic is probably burning it to create electricity.
It likely won't be recycled or reused and even if it is, it's likely that will only happen once (as recycled plastic is low quality).
So the option is bury it so it can outlast humanity underground or burn it to free up the carbon for hopefully regular consumption in the carbon cycle.
The only way plastic makes sense, then, is if we start using Carbon extracted from CO2 to create plastic.
Yes and no.
Some salts are easier to work with than others. Kosher salt, in particular, is fairly hard to over season with because you can visually see just how much you've thrown onto a steak or such. Fine salt, on the other hand, is a lot easier to over season with.
But then it also depends a lot on the dish. Sauces are really hard to over season. The sea of fluid can absorb a fair amount of salt before it's noticeable. Meats are similar. A steak can have a snow covering of kosher salt and it won't really taste super salty.
Bread, on the other hand, will be noticeably worse if you throw in a tbs of salt instead a tsp.
But salt wasn't specifically what I was thinking when I wrote that. Herbal seasoning garlic, rosemary, thyme, sage, etc, generally won't overpower a dish if you have too much of them. Especially if you aren't working with the powdered form. (Definitely possible to over season something with garlic salt/powder).
Yup. If you are going to own a printer, get a laser black and white printer and keep it forever. Do not get an inkjet printer. And if you need color prints (you don't) you can literally just do those at walgreens, cvs, or a bunch of other stores that will do color prints.
The only time you should get an inkjet printer is if you are a busy photographer selling a bunch of prints and you've hit the point where doing color prints through a store has become too expensive.