This is public record due to their financial reporting obligations as public company, but their password sharing crackdown resulted in not insignificant amounts of new subscribers.
Or at least, there was meaningful growth that occurred in time periods that aligned with those policies going into effect.
The reason he fell from favor was a coordinated and relentless media attack and smear campaign because he was beholden to Old Labour values, and not New Labour's brand of limp dick neoliberalism.
That may sound overly simplistic and vulgar, but it's accurate, and if anything, less vulgar than the smear campaign that was used to gun down his political career as party leader.
Uh I'm pretty sure they offer trauma counseling to all those contractors.
I mean, sure, it's from a sub-contracted provider, TraumaBots (powered by ChatGPT 3.5), but I've heard only 36% of TraumaBot's patients end up killing themselves.
A lot of human traffickers are Mexican, especially in the South West. Should probably ban Mexicans as well, just to be safe I guess.
Oh, and most mass shooters are white men, should probably ban them.
Gangbangers are another problem you mentioned, let's just go ahead and ban every male 18-28.
Prostitutes also a problem? Let's ban all females 18-32.
You're working backwards from a terrible policy, banning people for having shitty political views, and then justifying it by saying, "Well, they probably committed sex crimes because they're creepy".
I wasn't aware that sex trafficking and gangbanging were just considered acts of political extremism.
Because that's what I'm concerned about - banning people for the thought crimes of having shitty politics, which is something this team clearly engaged in.
I can't speak to any other role they played in preventing actual criminal activity, like you described, but those would be perfect examples of the types of people that should be banned.
But if your argument is that actual crime and "pre-crime" or "thought crimes" are the same, well, that's pretty Orwellian and something I strongly disagree with.
These are squad level ground launched air to ground munitions i.e. they're small enough to be carried by infantry units and have the explosive charge more akin to antitank munitions.
It has been black and white, since inception. Just on behalf of the federal government and those "complexities" you listed.
This is what nuance and the shading of gray looks like: science showing the other side of these projects, and the extreme costs which have primarily been borne by the indigenous tribes in the region.
Damnit. I hate when my local city government's finances are too fucked to pay the energy bill, but still have money for military weapons procurement.
Wait a minute....local city governments are able to purchase air launched cruise missiles and anti-tank weapons?!?! And they can export them to?!?!
Dude I think you might be onto something, that is pretty wild...makes you wonder what the dog catcher is really up to... probably moonlights with gig economy wetwork.
If anyone you read, or know, ever refers to a monarchy as progressive, you can immediately disregard everything they ever write, or say.
The only context where it's at least explainable would be in a limited to direct comparison between Jordan and the other regional monarchs with large petroleum reserves.
Because my comment was specifically about a Biden appointment to the FAA....But if you're looking for who to blame for the FAA being shit, well that goes back a heck of a lot further, and it's a bipartisan affair.
No, please don't expand the horrific practice of labeling of people as terrorists to use as a scarlet letter and help the FBI/DOJ get around those peski civil liberties.
The equitable answer isn't to expand the War on Terror to include more whites, it's to end it and repeal the unconstitutional laws that passed to support it.
Also, I'm pretty sure OP is an article bot, so don't think they'd take notice, or offense, regardless lol.
Lemmy.world communities tend to be less tolerable of any direct Biden criticism, at least in my experience. Although maybe they thought I was directing that opener at OP.
Get fucked. He has spent his whole professional career being an airline industry suit, which is why he was placed at the FAA by Biden: he's another industry plant in an completey captured regulator, by an industry captured government.
All he's doing is stating the obvious because the cats out of the bag. Don't hold your breath for this lifelong airline industry executive to be some savior or rebuilder of an independent FAA.
Whitaker began his aviation career as a litigator, then as assistant general counsel of international and regulatory affairs at Trans World Airlines (TWA). He spent 15 years at United Airlines in a variety of roles as director, vice president and senior vice president. His portfolio at the airline included commercial alliances and joint ventures, international and regulatory affairs, and strategic counsel to the chairman and chief executive officer on international matters.Whitaker served as Group CEO of InterGlobe Enterprises.There, he oversaw strategy and operations for four affiliate travel companies.
This poll is a notable outlier... The article is basically just a blog post from the polling outfit itself...
Here's results on 65 different polls for Michigan:
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/us/elections/polls-president-michigan.html
The vast majority of polls have Trump leading Michigan, but a lot of those are also within the margin of error and otherwise very close.
What is with Lemmy's insistence on pretending that the debate either didn't hurt Biden, or actually helped him?
It's like a lot of people here actually believe that by pretending nothing is wrong, that means nothing is wrong.