Well sometimes. Learning what deprecated means would probably have very broad usefulness. Learning the ins and outs of the library codebase that generated that error when you're only going to make minor use of it once might not. There's a practically infinite amount of things to learn and we all have finite time, attention, and space in our heads.
That's a great way to do it, but human attention on your code is a scarce and valuable resource. LLMs are great for the sort of lazy stupid questions where you benefit from a quick answer, but also don't want to waste someone else's time on. When you are learning nearly all the questions you'll have will be like this, your progress is gated on finding the answers, and even if you are taking a class and it's someone's job to look at your code and help you understand what's wrong with it, you have to wait your turn for that and only get so much help.
I like the idea of a serious commitment to a romantic relationship, but I wouldn't want the government to be involved in the associated ritual, just like I wouldn't want a church to be involved, or a diamond monopoly.
If they had let them fail then maybe we wouldn't be in the situation we are now with the entire banking system becoming consolidated (many banks have merged into larger banks). Maybe the massive redistribution of wealth towards the top that has occurred since that point would have been much less.
tbf the text in error messages very often leads down a rabbit hole of barely relevant context, rather than to the shortest path to getting things to work as you expect them to. Or maybe they just don't understand what the word "deprecated" means or implies.
There is something of a welfare cliff for medicaid, but aren't there also means tested subsidies/discounts on the health insurance market for when you make more than that but are still poor?
I think you'd have a really hard time finding someone on Lemmy genuinely trying to argue Japanese internment was a good thing, there's no need to immediately jump to the conclusion that people are saying that especially if it makes way more sense that they were saying something else.
Then criticizing those things would be legitimate. To disagree that there’s legitimate criticism regarding those issues is to condone them.
If what you meant by "legitimate criticisms" was to say that criticism of these policies themselves is legitimate, that's an extremely confusing way to say it given the context (both previous comments and the first part of your own comment), it very much sounds like you were saying something entirely different. I don't think it's fair to assume that someone objecting to your statement is objecting to that meaning of it.
The comment you're responding to really doesn't seem to be condoning those things; the thing being argued here is whether there was a push in a progressive direction, you said these events are evidence against that, which they countered with the idea that war has a regressive influence, something your quote is supporting.
I would be concerned about the privacy implications, but imo it is ok to do if it makes you feel better and isn't causing problems in your life. Seems kind of similar to something like writing fanfiction or keeping a diary, only you have a tool to help prompt what you write.
Participants with depression experienced a 51% reduction in symptoms, the best result in the study. Those with anxiety experienced a 31% reduction, and those at risk for eating disorders saw a 19% reduction in concerns about body image and weight.
However the person who did the study shares your concerns:
I asked Heinz if he thinks the results validate the burgeoning industry of AI therapy sites.
“Quite the opposite,” he says, cautioning that most don’t appear to train their models on evidence-based practices like cognitive behavioral therapy, and they likely don’t employ a team of trained researchers to monitor interactions. “I have a lot of concerns about the industry and how fast we’re moving without really kind of evaluating this,” he adds.
Also they did another article about difficulties and pitfalls of making these things
I disagree about Soma being an isolated setting, there are actually lots of characters, it's just that they're all insane cyborgs who mostly happen to have their own personal reasons for attacking you.
I can't seem to find them, but before the game came out there was a series of live action video shorts made in association with it to help establish the concept and setting, I'd imagine a show being along the lines of those but fleshed out more.
To me it would be worth it for Lemmy to get somewhat Eternal September'd if it meant Reddit being destroyed/replaced with something that isn't a company.
It would only succeed in filtering really low effort bots anyway, because it's really easy to programmatically check if you are shadowbanned. Someone who is trying to ban evade professionally is going to be way better equipped to figure it out than normal users.
chicken @ chicken @lemmy.dbzer0.com Posts 0Comments 1,230Joined 2 yr. ago
Well sometimes. Learning what deprecated means would probably have very broad usefulness. Learning the ins and outs of the library codebase that generated that error when you're only going to make minor use of it once might not. There's a practically infinite amount of things to learn and we all have finite time, attention, and space in our heads.