Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)CH
Posts
3
Comments
173
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • by default, your content is all rights reserved, the most restrictive license possible. AI trains on "all rights reserved" content all the time. You really think adding a CC-BY-NC is gonna do anything?

  • There's an issue without you saying not because you don't know econ 101, but because you do know it. Because you shift the focus from the systems (global imperialism) to the individuals ("so you shouldn't be allowed to migrate?"). What causes migration is, objectively, unequal development of different countries caused by imperialism and inherent to the market system, and not "personal decisions". That means shifting the talk to "personal decisions" is pointless and harmful.

    It's like going "oh but you voluntarily choose to buy/sell" and blaming all your economic problems on yourself.

  • There's no agency in the market. That's the entire point of markets - being independent of a single human's whims and being an equalizing force, the "invisible hand".

    And the entire point of communism is getting that agency, having production for the sake of humans rather than humans for the sake of production.

  • over a century ago Lenin has defined imperialism as capitalism in decay, monopoly capitalism, capitalism that has outgrown competition, that has stopped playing a progressive role in history and became solely a force of reaction, and since then not much has changed

  • at the time I commented it had like 14 upvotes and 0 downvotes, now it's at 15 upvotes and 14 downvotes, my comment got 2 downvotes like 5 minutes after posting it, but now it also has 5 upvotes.

    Looks like it just took some time for the better part of lemmy to get to this post.

  • as much as I wish it were spontaneous, it seems organized (many cases happened right on the first day of elections; (nearly?) all of the perpetrators were women across like 5-10 cases that I've read about; they all immediately started taking photos as if to show proof to someone), it seems like either Russia or Ukraine is behind that (the former would want it to discredit the opposition, the latter to discredit the Russian state, either option sounds plausible to me). Of course, the Russian police says Ukraine-linked scammers promised money for doing it.

    honestly with how much some scammers can achieve at times (I'd rather not say, I've seen some abhorrent cases in the news) I tend to believe the official Russian version

  • You are claiming that I said VP can magically override the US policy, while I said the exact opposite - VP can't and won't do shit unless the entire government undergoes a broad ideological shift.

    Before that, you talked about responsibility, which I didn't talk about at all. I simply said that Israel exists in its current form thanks to the US, which is objectively true. There's no "responsibility" or "morals" in saying that much, and people all across the political spectrum can agree with this.

    And no, I didn't call what you said a logical fallacy, because fallacy and logical fallacy are two different terms (leaving aside whether what you are saying is indeed a logical fallacy).

  • Your comments are a prime example of the fallacies of analytical (as opposed to dialectical) thinking. I'm talking about the broader interconnections, relations, tendencies, and you're trying to shift the focus from the system into its constituent parts. Of course, if you do that, you can get any conclusion you want. The fact of the matter is you can't look at Israel without looking at the US, you can't look at Kamala without looking at the American government.

    You're asking - "what would Kamala asking for ceasefire change". I say - Kamala is part of the American government, which is dead set on supporting Israel, and she wouldn't magically change her mind, because her consciousness, like anyone else's, is shaped by her social being. That said, that doesn't mean she won't ever change her mind - if she does, it would be indicative of broader shifts and contradictions among American elites. Her asking for ceasefire wouldn't be a cause - it would be a symptom. As for what American support for a ceasefire change, I wrote about that in my comment above.