Skip Navigation

User banner
Posts
6
Comments
225
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Smithiddy Toileg

  • That's not true. Depending on bean extraction and quantity, a standard "cup" of coffee will have 100-200mg of caffeine. Black tea bags have around 40-60. A good rule of thumb is about 4x. Getting shit tier coffee goes for about $8/lb and will make around 30 cups, so about 25c per cup. So compared to the meme, coffee is still more expensive per mg of caffeine.

    Edit: on Amazon you can get 200mg tablets for about 8c each. So that would be your best bang for the buck. Semi related, an old coworker would dissolve a caffeine pill in hot water and call it "Mormon coffee"; he was a character.

  • I try not to support people who claim moral high ground and treat people like sexual objects. Here's copy pasta from reddit. For external links, feel free to go to the original post.

    Summary of all the Accusations/Allegations against Andrew Torrez Andrew/Thomas

    Edit from 7/10/2023: I'm rewriting this thread so as to be more evergreen/an archive. Other than rephrasing some things, I've also reorganized the list (moved references to accusations with unnamed accusers to the end) and added one small additional accusation, so keep those changes in mind if you read any older comments (you may want to refer to the original post which is archived here).

    In early 2023, lawyer and host of the legal podcast Opening Arguments Andrew Torrez (AT) was accused of personal misconduct from 11 people* up to 9 of which are detailed below, mostly of sexual harassment but of sexual assault in 2 instances as well.

    The story broke when the outlet Religion News Service (RNS) published a story of how AT resigned from the board of the American Atheists concurrent to an ethics complaint being filed against him. The story also included some details about these accusations including Felicia Hart (1). In the following days more people came forward with accusations against him, regarding misconduct from 2017 to 2022.

    Keep in mind they're not all accusations of equally problematic misconduct nor do they all have the same information/receipts given. The accusers were often candid of this when sharing. Please do not contact anyone involved nor anyone on this list.

    There will be discussion of sexual misconduct beyond this point, so content warning for that:

    Felicia Hart (AKA Felicia Entwhistle): This is the accuser the RNS article focused on, and her statement and screenshots of her DMs with Andrew have been pretty widely disseminated. She accuses Andrew of inappropriate messages, and violating boundaries multiple times in conversations.

    Charone Frankel : the RNS article references her as a consensual partner and that Andrew wanted to continue their relationship after it ended. However she feels like the article left out a lot, giving a short statement/accusation of nonconsensual physical contact, on Facebook. (screenshot backup) Charone also has a slightly shorter statement available publicly on facebook.:

    [...] My chief complaint against Andrew Torrez is that on more than one occasion, he aggressively initiated physical intimacy without my consent. When he did this, I would either say no and try to stop it, or I would let myself be coerced into going along with it.

    1. Dell Onnerth: They worked with Felicia and others to bring the accusations to light, and is thanked/referenced to in Felicia's statement above. Dell has helpfully provided a summary of the rough timeline of events (screenshot backup), and has accused Andrew of sending them inappropriate messages:

    [...] I was one of many people who received inappropriate messages from Andrew. For a long time, there have been whisper network accusations of physical assault and lots of high pressure sexual messages. I hope all the other hosts will do the right thing and cease platforming someone who has been unsafe for women and femmes because it has had a major impact on who feels comfortable in this movement.

    1. Kaylie Woomer: Based on this twitter thread she also went to the PIAT crew (Puzzle in a Thunderstorm, a podcast network with which OA was associated) with unspecified concerns about Andrew. According to Dell's timeline above, it was with allegations of harassing messages. I'm unaware of her account commenting with specifics.
    2. Thomas Smith, former cohost of Opening Arguments until AT seized the podcast from him: he has accused Andrew of inappropriately touching him when they were drinking.
    3. An unnamed Accuser has accused Andrew Torrez of inappropriate messages sent to them in 2020 and 2021. (Screenshot Backup) Note: initially this accuser posted this on social media with their real name and DM screenshots but shortly thereafter it was unavailable, and then this anonymized statement was provided. I won't be sharing their name/the DM screenshots but I did see the original post and do have a record of it.
    4. Unnamed person who accuses Andrew of nonconsensual physical contact them in 2017. Their accusation is a key part of the story of the accusations being brought forward. They are apparently too worried of retribution to come forward, but did confide in other people and also told peers of Andrew (like some hosts of PIAT). This seems to be the earliest relevant misconduct in the timeline. Dell has referenced them several times in their statements (see here, also included above), as has Ari Stillman (screenshot backup) (Ari is a former admin for PIAT on Facebook)
    5. Another woman shared creepy texts with Andrew Torrez (on Facebook, so originally a named accusation) on a post authored by Dell Onnerth. Dell later deleted this post, which also made the replies unavailable. Out of an abundance of caution I'm not sharing this one either. But like with 6 I did see the original post and do have a record of it.
    6. In reply to a statement Teresa Gomez published on this (r/OpenArgs) subreddit (Teresa was formerly an admin of the OA Facebook group and ran the previous live shows), a user commented in reply saying that AT has sent them things that were "disrespectful and wrong". As this is anonymized/details are not known, this may be a redundant entry.
    • Collectively these are nine accusations. On the google drive, Dell Onnerth mentions there are eleven accusations known of to them. So there are at least two more out there that I either missed or are private.

    For the sake of completion, I'm going to include AT's two attempted apologies for his actions. First his initial statement on the OA group, and here his second one uploaded as a statement to the OA podcast feed (done after/in response to Thomas Smith's (6) accusation in specific). In said statements he affirms sending creepy text messages, denies Thomas Smith's accusations, and does not address the more serious accusations from (2) and (7). In a later statement in court filings, AT characterizes these as profusely apologizing.

    As before, if I have missed something or a link is inaccessible please let me know!

  • To be pedantic, 0.4% of Democrats opposed.

    But yeah I agree that it is relevant that it was passed with more D than R votes.

  • There doesn't have to be. But there is because Republicans want it. They love the media circus. They love the leverage to play hardball. They refuse to pass measures that prevent it in the future. And with our current form of government, it would take 60 senate votes to pass something like fixing shutdowns, which aren't there.

  • Biggest thing is that the Senate is populated with much more experienced Congresspeople, who have much longer election cycles. They don't need to grab the headlines constantly to keep top of mind for their constituents.

    I'd say there's another portion that's because things have simply gotten that much crazier in the last handful of years. Some congressman don't have any shame as to their brazen sand in the gears.

    Voting to avoid shutdown is really dumb from an insider perspective too. But the party that loves to do nothing refuses to change the rules to have an automatic continuing resolution without a budget. And any change to require "automatic vote of no confidence" would have to be a constitutional amendment, and thus will never happen.

  • You're putting way too much good faith into the Republican party. Way more than just the insurrection party are refusing to take part in any speaker vote that receives bipartisan support. They see collaboration as a poison pill. No one is surviving with the single vote guillotine, which is why it's such a stupid ducking rule in the first place and had never been done before.

  • Is he a terrible speaker? Or did he launch himself headfirst into an impossible situation? Not to defend him, but I don't think anyone put in the speakership with this Congress would be thriving.

  • Not only that, Amazon has the mechanisms to prevent counterfeiting today: dedicated bins for individual sellers products. They just make the vendors pay an extra fee to use it.

    Literally extorting their sellers. "Gee it'd be a shame if some counterfeit merchandise were to be sold instead of yours. I could protect you from that"

  • Got me

  • Dash materials have improved and don't dry and crack after 3 years in the sun

  • E2E is not enough. You can still be subpoenaed for Signal messages if they aren't auto-deleted. Just ask all the folks involved in the trump indictments.

  • Ain't much

  • Obviously because they agree that the federal government should be taking guns and locking up anyone who uses any drug. /s