I like the comparison of a robber going into a bank with a piece of paper saying "put all the money in the bag or else" and then getting indignant "Ohhh well I guess WRITING IS ILLEGAL NOW"
Slightly more gray: content I've already paid for in one form or another. I spent like $100 going to the theater to see Mario with the family. I'm not losing sleep over adding it to my Plex when it hits VOD.
So you want the party of "I'd eat my own shit if it meant democrats had to smell it on my breath" to have the unilateral power to remove every single one of their "enemies" for a decade?
The difference is there is American federal policy being put in place around TikTok specifically that is not being done against other social media apps.
Legal experts say any such suit would have virtually no chance of success, given serious jurisdictional, procedural and substantive problems.
On the substantive point: These kinds of shareholder suits are typically brought when members of a corporate board engage in self-dealing or fail in an oversight duty when the corporation has seriously violated the law. In this case, AB InBev merely made a (completely legal) marketing decision, in an attempt to expand its customer base. The strategy might have backfired — again, because of the anti-trans animus of people such as DeSantis — but that doesn’t mean the board somehow breached its fiduciary duty
DUDE! I was working in a coffee shop today and someone came in wearing what I would describe as "Tennis Barbie-core". I had no idea if it was a bit, but they walked in like it was Tuesday. I was in the same shopping center as a movie theater, but also this was a bougie area, so it's really a coin flip.
I like the comparison of a robber going into a bank with a piece of paper saying "put all the money in the bag or else" and then getting indignant "Ohhh well I guess WRITING IS ILLEGAL NOW"