Because she wasn't. She was the first woman to fly Solo across the Atlantic.
The fated flight would have seen her become the first woman to Fly around the world, no mention of being Solo.
You are quite right.
The link just took me to the FAQ, I didn't see the entire infographic above it. Very interesting and you are right, Business Class is less than 15% of passenger numbers but they account for 70% of profits.
This doesn't address the point. OP said Economy makes them the most money. Sure, Business class is most profitable per ft. But it's only 25% of the plane at best.
It's not just Simps. Boomers are very vulnerable to this technology, especially the lonely or widows. For some reason, they can be recklessly trusting of internet relationships/technologies. Hence why they keep getting exploited by Romance and Pig Butchering scams and why they can't get enough Facebook Trump/COVID misinformation.
Good point.
Give a man a free meal, he eats for a day.
Seed fund an industrial unit churning out basic healthy meals and employ an UberEats-type workforce of homeless/disadvantaged people to distribute the meals, all under a non-profit banner, and hundreds of the poorest of society can eat for $2-5 a day.
Oh, How I long for the olden days...
I would literally die for a fresh glass of water plucked from a local stream.
The copious amounts of lead and mercury combine with the rich abundance of feces, microbacteria and other organic matter, to create a pure, natural live giving elixir.
Now all of that has been removed and replaced with modern plastic. No thanks
Irreversible.
A French film (alarm bells already) that disturbs me even to this day.
Makes you grateful for your loved ones and how fragile life can be, how one unlucky encounter can flip everything on its head and you may have no influence over any of it.
Difficult viewing for sure and the message shouldn't be to live in fear but to enjoy every good moment you get.
They already do this in Europe and other countries where mixed car/pedestrian environments are more common.
Electric cars must have some form of audible signature, usually a quiet whirring sound.
Well there is a clear evolutionary advantage to being wary of 'difference' and you can see that behaviour in nearly every species. Yes, even fluffy puppy dogs.
Human society is the one exception. We have beaten mother nature in the natural world (hunger, warmth and shelter) and now we are focussing on the primordial mother nature within us.
Where we cant directly fix a physical or genetic weakness, we reprogramme ourselves (via society) to normalise and accept differences amongst us.
Attitudes to Rudolph show how much we have changed in recent years.
Very well made and researched. Very engaging. My favourite is the Blueprint for Armageddon as it covers more recent history which I personally find more relatable, and therefore more powerful, than the other topics.
I would love a WW2 series. His arguement is that it is already very well documented from other sources, but I think Dan could really do it justice. zooming in on a specific part of the conflict would be great.
If you never enable any data services on your SIM (GSM only for calls) and never connect to WiFi. You're not leaking anymore data than an old fashioned phone.
However, the fact that you are asking these questions does suggest you are probably being unhealthily paranoid. (Reading these replies, it seems you are in good company on this forum.)
I'm going to assume you are not engaging in high level cyber activities that would require you to adopt this level or paranoia. If you were, you wouldn't be asking basic questions.
Instead, it sounds like you have developed an irrational fear of what tech companies can realistically do with your data and what level of harm they may wish to cause you.
Typically, they can log your search and browser data to determine if, for example, you like pizza. Then they may show you an advert for pizza or highlight the nearest Dominos on Google maps. But... they can only do that if you share that information with them in the first place by using your new smart phone (with none of the privacy settings enabled) to search for pizza and then using Google maps. Nobody is forcing you to do that. But is it really that bad even if you do?
Google are not going to clone you, or assassinate you or somehow work out you are not paying taxes or are engaging in illegal activity unless you use your phone to do it. And even then, they don't go round grassing people up to the government for the fun of it. They just want you to click on adverts and, once you are aware of how they operate, it's relatively easy to avoid them whilst still getting great value from a pretty incredible piece of modern technology.
Now, if you are genuinely worried about government targeting (I don't know what country you live in) an encrypted messaging App will be significantly more secure than an unencrypted old GSM phone that is quite easy to intercept and relies on the integrity of your MNO provider.
My advice, stop worrying. You already have a cautious mindset so you won't get tricked by these companies, but you could also be enjoying many of the benefits of being able to access all of humanities collective information from your pocket.
Because she wasn't. She was the first woman to fly Solo across the Atlantic. The fated flight would have seen her become the first woman to Fly around the world, no mention of being Solo.