cecilkorik @ cecilkorik @lemmy.ca

Posts

1

Comments

507

Joined

2 yr. ago

Maybe having a competent government would help. Can we try that?

Don't worry, they'll tattoo your NFT on for you when they send you to the work camps.

That's awesome thanks! (Community discovery is still something I struggle with on Lemmy)

Reddit had a community "OutOfTheLoop" for these type of questions. It was very helpful for people like me who do our best to ignore these nonsense viral image macros that get blown out of proportion. The problem on Lemmy is, judging by the comments here, I think almost everyone here avoids those things like the plague, so there's few if anyone "InTheLoop" around to explain for us.

This is a good attitude. The cynicism is well-earned, but ultimately self-defeating. Not all wealthy people are intentionally and actively hostile, and even if they are, sometimes it is effective to turn enemies into allies, maybe just temporary ones, or even just avoid fighting the least rewarding ones at all if it's not going to cost you anything and lets you combine your forces to focus on the battles that really matter. This is class war, and war calls for strategy. Fight smart and spend our limited resources wisely. Trump and Muskrat are about a million times more direct of a threat to our survival than JB Pritzker or the Waltons. You don't have to trust any of them, but it's a strategic blunder to waste time and energy attacking the ones who aren't attacking us. Don't depend on them if you don't have to, but let them try to help, if they can.

125F is the maximum recommended storage temperature. Like the people who overfill their tanks, it will probably be okay for a bit above that, but you run the risk of rupturing the safety valve. Not sure how hot your garage typically gets, but it's probably not an ideal storage place. FWIW propane's maximum recommended storage temperature is only 120F, so if CO2's not safe in your garage neither is propane. Some ventilation would probably help keep temperatures down. Keep in mind this is actual physical tank temperature we're talking about. Direct sunlight matters -- humidex and "feels like" temperatures don't.

Yes, they're all pretty much the same except for threaded vs quick connect. Some people prefer the ones with steel braided hoses for safety. The main "danger" of overfilling is that once the ice melts to liquid and boils to gas the pressure will go to the moon and burst the safety valve (permanently), becoming a broken tank with a small leak that vents gas quicker than the liquid can boil. Large amounts of rapidly venting CO2 create thick fog rolling along the ground (as seen in many halloween displays for example) so the leak would be obvious and is not dangerous as long as you don't lay down and stick your face in it and try to breathe for awhile. If you don't notice it you may be surprised to find your tank is empty when you go to use it, and any attempts to refill it will immediately start leaking. Anyway, it's an expensive mistake so you probably won't make it more than once. Technically the burst disc can be replaced, but that's beyond the scope of this discussion.

It's easy to avoid as long as you understand that filling can only be done reliably by weight, not by time, feel, eyeball or pressure or anything else. Whether you're using dry ice or liquid from another tank, the weight of the tank is all that matters. An empty tank is a particular weight which can be measured as it will have to be completely empty before you attempt refilling it anyway. A full tank is a higher weight. The weight you should not exceed should be printed on all tanks but for Sodastream-size tanks can hold exactly 410g above empty weight. Less is fine. More is risky (some people do exceed it regularly though, but that's on them and their wallet) Pressure is mostly meaningless for a liquified gas like CO2, the liquid phase maintains constant pressure as dictated by temperature and physics.

Liquified gases don't really "explode" like pressurized gases, they either vent, or leak. This can be noisy and visually dramatic but is not a safety concern. Even a catastrophic failure will remain mostly liquid for a long time and is just a spill of increasingly cold liquid that is creating fog (more and more slowly as it uses up all the available heat by becoming cold). The gas doesn't appear instantly, the liquid has to boil to make more gas, and that takes a lot of time and heat it has to absorb first before it can do that. The biggest risk is frostbite, not explosion. The liquid CO2 gets very cold when boiling freely, because of all the surrounding heat it's absorbing to try to turn into gas. It is not a fast process. This is also how dry ice works, and why it stays ice for so long, and why we can use it to make things very cold for a very long time. FWIW propane is also a liquified gas, and behaves mostly the same way, except that it is flammable, which can make it explosive under certain conditions. Some people are bothered having a propane tank next to their house, but most people aren't. CO2 isn't flammable or explosive, it's safe enough to have in your kitchen in my opinion. In a pinch it can double as a fire extinguisher. :P

Their goal was to get attention, to force the media and public to start talking about it, to force western governments to pretend to care about it, ratchet up the international pressure by another notch. They have done everything they need to be successful at that. Now that they've been seized, it's our jobs to do what we can to make the rest of that happen.

Drinkmate is honestly a similar-but-better design, speaking as someone who moderated Reddit's sodastream community for years. And I think most users of that subreddit would agree with me. Sodastream just has better marketing and all the market share so it has become the "Kleenex" of the category as the first one anyone thinks of and often the only one they even can name.

Assuming North America, you can get standard Sodastream->CGA320 "direct connect" adapters that let you hook the machine to a standard CO2 tank of any size (it won't fit inside the machine but I don't consider that a functional requirement). Similar adapters are made for other regions I just don't know their specific sizes and terminologies.

Why isn't there a Berlin airlift for Gaza? Why aren't navies escorting aid ships? Those are rhetorical questions, you don't need to answer it for me. I know most governments with any ability to project power support the genocide.

I've never been happier about my Prusa, despite some of what I felt were their suboptimal choices in the last few years, at least they've never seemed malicious.

Welcome!

But I have to ask, why are you guys here and not on Reddirt?

Hilarious typo if it wasn't intentional.

Where the population us much larger and its basically the same?

First thing you quickly realize here is that larger is not necessarily better. Small is beautiful, you can have actual thoughtful conversations with individuals here without the incessant dogpiling and low effort meme replies. I have even got smacked down (and rightly so) for accidentally bringing some of that with me at one point. It's not needed or desirable here.

It appears a few instances dominate this landscape anyway?

When you actually look at the comments I usually find almost everyone is on a different instance, in fact when there are relatively small numbers of comments like the are on most posts, you often won't even see the same instance in the comments twice unless it's the same person. Yeah, some instances have "huge numbers" of people and communities (lemmy.world) but I think a lot of them are honestly just rarely used, abandoned, or otherwise non-participatory, and the communities can be used by anybody (which is exactly the point of federation). The people actually spending their time here are on a wide variety of instances, often even using different frontends or software. And that's great. To me, the ecosystem feels healthy and diverse.

Its not like this is unchecked social media, they still moderate these places right?

The point is you can choose an instance whose moderations suit you. (Almost?) all instances moderate to some degree, complete unmoderation is how you end up infested with child porn and other horrible shit. But the directions they moderate in, and the specific things they moderate, can vary wildly depending on the preferences of the owners and the countries they operate in. They also federate with and defederate different instances, which is a large-scale form of moderation. Most instances defederate (and have been defederated by) hexbear and lemmygrad. But not all of them do. Some also defederate lemmy.ml. But not most. And of course those three still federate with each other, and with some other instances. The point isn't to completely prevent isolated echo chambers, it's to allow the instances themselves (and the users who join them) to choose how much echo they want to hear compared to how many challenging views they disagree with. Everyone should be able to find a balance that suits them. Most of the people complaining about the content on Lemmy have probably just chosen the wrong instance, frankly, because most people don't understand how this works and the biases and moderation attitudes inherent in all these different instances is not always super obvious at first glance.

Reddit sucks now. I still check there regularly but I find both the content and the commenting less and less interesting and find myself spending less and less time there. It hasn't been a sudden process, but the more time I spend on Lemmy the more I like it and the more communities I find and engage in.

Honesty, empathy and respect.

Good luck ever convincing me an LLM has any of those. I'm not even convinced most of humanity does.

It's mostly a relic from an older time, it can be useful for more traditional services and situations that struggle with sharing public IPs. In theory, things like multiple IP addresses (and IPv6's near unlimited addresses) could be used to make things simpler -- you don't need reverse proxies and NAT and port forwarding (all of which were once viewed as excessive complexity if not outright ugly hacks instead of the virtual necessity they are today).

Each service would have its own dedicated public IP, you'd connect them up with IP routing the way the kernel gods intended, and everything would be straightforward, clear, and happy. If such a quantity of IPs were freely available, this would indeed be a simpler life in many ways. And yet it's such a distant fantasy now that it's understandable (though a little funny) to hear you describe it as "additional complexity" when, depending on how you look at it, the opposite is true...

From a modern perspective, you're absolutely right. The tables have really been turned, we have taken the limitation of IP addresses in stride, we have built elaborate systems of tools and layers of abstraction that not only turn these IP-shortage lemons into lemonade, the way we've virtualized the connections through featureful and easily-configurable software layers like private IP ranges, IP masquerading, proxies and tunnels can be used to achieve immense flexibility and reliable security. Most software now natively supports handling multiple services on a single IP or even a single port, and in some cases it requires it. This was not always the case.

It's sort of like the divide between hardware RAID and software RAID. Once upon a time, software RAID was slow, messy, confusing, unreliable, and distinctly inferior to "true" hardware RAID, which was plug-and-play with powerful configuration options. Nobody would willingly use software RAID if they had any other choice, the best RAID cards were sold for thousands of dollars and motherboards advertised how much hardware RAID they had built-in. But over time, as CPUs and software became faster and more powerful, the tide changed, and people started to realize that actually, hardware RAID was the one that left you tied to an expensive proprietary controller that could fail or become obsolete and leave your array a difficult to migrate or recover mess, whereas software RAID was reliable, predictable, upgradable, supporting a wide variety of disk types and layouts while still performing solidly and was generally far nicer to work with. It became the more common configuration, and found its way into almost every OS. You can now set up software RAID simply by clicking an option in a menu, even in Windows, and it basically works flawlessly without any additional thought.

Times change, we adapt to the technologies that are most common and that work the best in the situations we're using them in, and we make them better until they're not just a last resort anymore, but become a first choice, while the old way becomes a confusing anachronism. That's what multiple public IPs have become nowadays, for most purposes.

That's exactly my point. If they do in a few days "come back from" that and are all buddy buddy again, then I think that indicates it was just a staged performance for show and distraction and none of it was real fighting. Suggests it was all just an act. (IF they do come back from it. Which remains to be seen)

Muskrat has already backed down from a few things he said in the "heat" of the argument, like that he was going to disassemble the Dragon capsules. So I wouldn't jump to your conclusion that they can't possibly "come back from" this, my point is just that if they do, it was probably all just an act to begin with because I agree if it's real, stuff was said that neither one of these vindictive sociopaths is likely to forget.

I'm putting 50/50 odds that it's an intentional, theatrical distraction from other more important things that are going on, or it's just the inevitable outcome of two malignant narcissist sociopaths being in the same room together too often. If they quickly kiss and make up I'll lean more towards the former than the latter.

It also sounds like sealioning. So yeah genocide denial by either shutting you up or making you appear to be the bigot would be the goal.

The problem honestly isn't even the seawater, necessarily. Even that is technically fixable.

Where it gets potentially unfixable is that most naval architects seem to think that the ship probably twisted her keel lying in that position. Non-naval-architects might not appreciate what a catastrophic problem that is, to put it roughly in automotive terms that's like having a twisted frame on a car (it's actually significantly worse, but that's the closest layperson analogy you're likely to get). There's nothing you can do to to a twisted frame to exactly straighten it, and it will never drive "properly" again, in fact it can be extremely unstable and unsafe. Cars that this happens to are basically without exception considered "totaled" and for good reason.

Ships, in general, and warships, in particular, can be put under pretty extreme forces by the water they are in, especially at high speeds or heavy seas, and even small imperfections in the shape of the hull can cause very serious hydrodynamic drag and forces. These effects can be even stronger and more dramatic than aerodynamic effects on cars or airplanes since the water itself is so much thicker and heavier as a fluid. A ship with a twisted hull is almost certainly a write-off, and if you stubbornly refuse to accept that and do everything you can to mitigate it, even if you are lucky it will still likely be a poor, dangerous sailer that can never safely approach anything near the sort of speeds it was originally designed to achieve. A warship that can only go half the speed, and half the range it was designed to, with a non-negligible chance that it may be so poorly handling that it is at least uncomfortable and hard to crew, if not actually dangerous or even doomed in heavy weather, is not a very useful warship, no matter how hard you are committed to putting it into service despite the damage.

Yeah, maybe it still floats, but that's only a small part of what a ship is actually expected to be able to do in the real world, and "modern warship" is a pretty unforgiving role that needs every bit of performance the ship is supposed to be able to provide. It's not a situation where you can accept having a scratch-and-dent salvage title if you want it to actually be good at its job. That's why people are considering this a total loss (and it still will be no matter how much work they put into it).