ccunning @ ccunning @lemmy.world

Posts

67

Comments

1,389

Joined

2 yr. ago

Shit post != shitpost

Alternate (More accurate) Headline:
\ Washington Post editorial writers’ endorsement of Kamala Harris stopped by CEO

“The Washington Post will not be making an endorsement of a presidential candidate in this election,” wrote Will Lewis, The Post’s chief executive. “Nor in any future presidential election. We are returning to our roots of not endorsing presidential candidates.”

The Washington Post’s editorial writers had already drafted an endorsement of Vice President Kamala Harris for president, according to four people who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive newsroom matters.

I was pretty confident that was how blocking worked on Lemmy. Is it not the case?

I did think twitter worked the way you describe, blocking the blockee from seeing the blockers content vs blocking the blocker from seeing the blockee’s content

At a starting price of $799, the Apple iPhone 16 costs more than many flagships, but the 60 Hz OLED display cannot even outperform the screens of certain mid-range smartphones.

I’m confused. The article sounds like they’re trying to pass judgement on the display based on the cost of the entire phone.

It would kind of make sense if it was a 6” portable display.

It me

Shallow playbook.

You go to war with the army you have…

I just hope he doesn’t manage to run out the clock before facing consequences.

I wouldn’t bet on it, but I do hope for it.

I just realized my joke is backwards but I think I’m leaving it anyway…

Wow - a whole trailer full of cowbells?

Lincoln Project founder Rick Wilson: “Kamala came to Fox to stack bodies.”

😂

…and on a more serious note:

Former New York Congressman Max Rose called it “a home run, because she sent the one message that needs to be sent, which was, ‘I will go anywhere at any time and show the courage necessary to speak to every American,’ because that’s what a real president does. The primary critique against her prior to this point was that she was not doing enough interviews. No one thought that the Fox News interview was going to go swimmingly every step of the way. Everyone knew it would be adversarial, but she showed exactly what she needed to show, which was that she is a leader, ready to be president on Day One.”

I could only find MSN aggregation of third rate sources (Times Now, The Spun, and Daily Beast).

Do you have a link?

No shit. I did find some reports confirming that, but none I trust enough to share.

These people have put political signs everywhere around here that say “Vote Cupcakes” or “Vote Cookies for president”

They think it’s all a joke

That's the one group I don't understand, the finance guys, business owners, stock analysts, etc. How can they possibly be on team Trump?

Tax cuts for the rich

I’m happy with my Fellow Ode 2. The ionizer is a game changer. If I wanted something that could do espresso too I’d probably start looking at the Opus.

I might look at the 1zpresso J-Ultra, but I’m not sure how well it handles filter coffee.

I could do it, but not since the stairs are out of TP

Yeah - there must be some calculation done to estimate inefficiency.

1% Subscribed
\ 98% Local/New
\ 1% All

I am looking at the numbers. Your graphic says the same thing the article does. That’s why I was asking for clarification