catloaf @ catloaf @lemm.ee

Posts

3

Comments

7,330

Joined

1 yr. ago

As long as we're talking language...

whelp

noun

the young of a carnivore, as a dog, bear, lion, seal, etc.

a youth, especially an impudent or despised one.

The onomatopoeia is "welp". Just because autocorrect says something doesn't make it so.

Real "Judean people's front" vibes with that one

Jellyfin should be fine. Why do you say it breaks it?

It's a valid argument, but it's not supported by their actions, which are demonstrably exploitative.

And not really comparable to rape, especially child rape, due to consent obviously; there is no non-exploitative form of that. Sex work is work, but children can never give informed consent, and even adult sex tourism is almost always exploitative.

I have never in my life found a paper bag with handles that will hold groceries. I'd need easily twice as many to hold all my groceries vs my reusable ones.

True, but that assumes 100% accuracy in convictions.

That's how they've done it for centuries. Not everyone has a journalist on the ground.

held in one of Miller’s children’s brokerage accounts

So not exactly for his own benefit. Doesn't say who manages the account.

Sometimes the ownership is through a fund, too, but this sounds like direct ownership.

No. Most cameras have filters to cut non-visible light.

And any EM that passes through a mask is probably going to pass through flesh too. And any EM that's transmitted and not reflected means it can't be imaged by a sensor.

Very thin fabric, like a thin white T-shirt, can be transparent to IR in bright sunlight. But that's a fairly rare case.

I heard a bit on NPR over the weekend talking about copaganda. Turns out body cams are beneficial to cops, because they can take that footage and selectively edit and release it to push a certain narrative.

If you've ever seen a clip on social media, it often starts a few seconds before the cop hits someone, rarely showing the full sequence of events that led up to that point.

And if they can't edit the footage to make them look good? "Oops, we didn't retrieve that footage in time so it was overwritten."

"They're too big to fail, they're the only major domestic aircraft manufacturer!" Ok so nationalize them

Production is subsidized by the government, so it's not a free market.

Undercutting competitors to establish a monopoly.

It passed the House last time. He's slowly losing the support of the Republicans. It could pass the Senate.

Troops in the field don't have cell phones and wifi, they have radios at best. A sat phone if they're really important.

Yeah the individuals probably still have personal devices (even though they're not supposed to) but they don't keep a phone tree, and it's unlikely they have service in a war zone.

It's more powerful than the one in Windows and faster than installing a third-party one. Also it does unit conversions.

You could have every democrat and independent vote to remove and it still won't pass without Republicans.

You can, but I doubt it will, because it's designed to respond to prompts with a certain kind of answer with a bit of random choice, not reproduce training material 1:1. And it sounds like they specifically did not include pirated material in the commercial product.

Slip and hit his head

The order seems to say that the trained LLM and the commercial Claude product are not linked, which supports the decision. But I'm not sure how he came to that conclusion. I'm going to have to read the full order when I have time.

This might be appealed, but I doubt it'll be taken up by SCOTUS until there are conflicting federal court rulings.