casual_turtle_stew_enjoyer @ casual_turtle_stew_enjoyer @sh.itjust.works

"you thought you did something there, didn't you?"

---

Read more

Posts

1

Comments

245

Joined

2 yr. ago

Then created a GitHub account to post three separate issues complaining about how the project's executable is an obvious Trojan, patting themself on the back for keeping the community safe with their expert sleuthing.

Has a slightly toxic, mysandristic taste to it, but overall the stew is much more palatable than anything else that came from this awkward creature.

Stamets, do you want me to catch the 4 inch cockroach that I've been raising free-range in my apartment and send it to you to find out? It's on a non-GMO diet.

I don't support flagrantly massacring civilians, but since you stooped to his level by indulging in his numbers game, I grew curious how the numbers actually compare and would like to share, just as an objective reference for perspective.

Stick around/read bottom part for the big caveat on these numbers though, if it isn't already obvious.

United States Holocaust Memorial Museum estimates 6 million of 9.5 million European Jews died in the Holocaust. Mass murder by poison gas appears to have commenced on/around Dec 08 '41 first at Chelmno and presumably ceased around the time Germany surrendered on May 07 '45. 1246 days of killing. 6,000,000/1246 = ~4,815 Jews killed per day on average.

I don't recall the exact date Israel began retaliations, I believe it was around 3 weeks after, but I'm going to start the time window for Israel's slaughter on Oct 7 '23 to keep things simple, mind the inaccuracy that comes with this. As of time of writing, on Feb 19 '24 (135 days since window start), Gaza Health Ministry has stated that at least 29,000 Palestinians have been killed since the start of the war. 29,000/135 = ~215.

So when comparing the numbers killed per day, we're still at not even 1/20th the scale of the Holocaust. Regardless, we should hope to never even be near 1/100th the scale, but this is reality and these are the numbers.

Next I want to look at population. Mosaica counts ~5 million Palestinians combined in Gaza and West Bank. This means that, so far, roughly 0.6% of the Palestinian population has been slaughtered compared to the estimated 2 out of 3 European Jews slaughtered in the Holocaust...

NOW for the caveat: we are only 135 days in. They didn't even have Auschwitz operational 135 days into Hitler's reign. I'm not a historian. I can't tell you how many Jews died 135 days into the Holocaust, and I can't even give you a ballpark range. So if you really want a numbers to numbers comparison, I guess you'll have to wait until after history repeats itself to crunch the numbers.

Seeing lots of wrong answers here, though I can't guarantee I'll be any more accurate. But I have a feeling this has to do with how ente.io's email egress is set up.

They have three email origins provided (all from Zoho): Zoho, ZCsend, and TransMail. I would expect that Zoho is for support and business email, ZCsend is for marketing, and TransMail handles transactional emails such as billing and password resets. That said, I only see a domain key for Zoho attached to their ente.io domain. This means when Gmail's SMTP servers might not be able to successfully authenticate the email's origin if it's sent through ZCsend or TransMail, leading them to take the default action of marking spam for an unauthenticated marketing-/phishing-esque email.

TL;DR Google most likely isn't doing this intentionally, but rather ente.io's email service might not be configured the best and Gmail is unable to distinguish it from what it considers spam as a result.

At first I read this as "these species can fuck each other". Then I realized that this is only concerning conception, all these species could fuck each other as they please.

Wtf does this have to do with her gender? Are you claiming she does not top the charts in celebrity carbon emissions, but is being used as the scapegoat instead of a man?

The Conservatives aren't attacking her because of her gender, it's because of their her influence. Misogyny has nothing to do with it, they'd do the exact same with any celebrity of any identity/orientation because they're influence conflicts with their agenda, not because of their gender.

This smells a lot like ground-laying for radical feminist arguments, I can't find any other reason you would be here making a mountain out of an imaginary anthill. Moreover, I can't understand why anyone upvoting this would care to see a non-humorous PSA in a "hello fellow teens" vaporware frame on a surrealist/(whatever it's called) shitposting community unless it is meant to be satire.

edit: gendered a pronoun to make it concise who the subject was

L take, only because you have people like u/awkwardtheturtle who like to brand anyone who disagrees with them as the public enemy. I haven't read up on this extension in a couple years, but last I checked there was no safeguard from one user just going in and falsely flagging accounts. If they have something in place to reasonably prevent this, then my point might be mute. But if they don't, then fuck em.

How about don't assume all mean are sweaty horny jerks.

It's hard to set yourself apart when you're dismissed right from the start because of your identity. That's why lonely men kind comfort in the company of other men, cause men are less prejudiced towards men.

I welcome the ban. Equality means equal respect. I die on this hill proudly

I generally always tip what I feel is generous if I'm able to, because thankfully I just have the luxury of spare change to blow from being a little more frugile these days, watching my spending and all that jazz. But honestly, if I was smart, and truly frugile, I'd be saving that money by not tipping, but also by making a meal at home instead whenever it's an option. But I'm willing participating in the machinations of the local service economy whenever I order delivery, or go to a restaurant, or do many things that would involve tipping. That said, retail tipping feels kind of weird except for some specialty shops where it's totally unnecessary but something to consider when you get excellent service.

But fuck all the profiteers behind all the schemes in the service industry that exploit workers by forcing them to rely on tipping, it's actually fucking bullshit. Wait staff and delivery drivers can get paid as low as $4/hour once they've received some balance in tips, when they should probably be getting around $20/hour and up in most cases. It's actually third world level.

But nah fam what kind $70 meal we talking? If you paying $70 for a steak, a couple drinks and whatever else at an especially nice place, you bet your fucking ass you'll tip $17.50 if the food and service is worth it, because you're spending 1-2 hours at that nice restaurant and your service occupies an amount of man-hours that might otherwise not be well compensated. Actually, maybe 25%/$17.50 is a bit much, it really just depends on the meal and the place. I feel like I would do 15% if service was ok, 20% if good, 25% if great but again it's all about setting.

I can't self-report what industry I'm in without potentially doxxing myself, but I can assure you he knows a lot less than he lets on.

I don't care what variety of topics they have, a respectable techie and creator would know how to admit when they are inexperienced with something. Linus does not. And he cannot admit he's wrong unless he can somehow spin it to make him look more likeable.

If you are seriously passionate about tech, save yourself the heartache and find a new creator/influencer. If you are just there for the content, enjoy it while there is still some element to it that is enjoyable. They are not on a sustainable trajectory.

Rick rolling the opponent's flight engineer in the middle of a dogfight.

Yeah, but that just goes to show how little he knows-- he can't even install it right.

And when he blamed Pop!_OS for tanking his Linux Daily Driver challenge, biggest cop out ever. I had updated my Pop workstation when it happened. The issue was resolved the next day. He could have waited 24 hours and then continued his challenge unimpeded.

Actually a poser.

He actually doesn't know how to install Linux. Or anything about it in fact. In fact, he knows frightening little about the tech he talks about.

I created a GitLab account long before they implemented this, but never used it. Went to post an issue related to self-hosted GitLab on their issue tracker, and it told me my account was banned. I wrote an email to support and they essentially said "an automated system identified your account as a bot and banned you during an account clean up some years ago to cut back on malicious users". I informed them that this was not at all reasonable, as I've never even posted anything on any GitLab account, and that I would be advising my organization to never pay for any GitLab product or service unless legal writes up the contract terms, because I have no faith in them as a vendor.

Seriously, fuck GitLab. And if anyone from that org wants to discuss this with me, they can pipe their email to /dev/null

well yeah, you don't speak with your mouth closed

Nope. Afaik, there is still no legal precedent set that you must make your publicly available website usable on more than one browser suite. Which is ludicrous, because Google has quietly been trying to make Chrome the only option.

If someone wants a tiny home, that's their problem, not yours or mine.

Thank you for providing that context, I saw nothing about that in my (brief, limited) search. The quote felt incomplete, but it was more than enough for me to find news articles providing extra context. Here's the full tweet, for anyone at OOTL as I am:

“Jews were beaten in the streets, not by Nazi soldiers but by their neighbors.... even by children.

Because history is edited, most people today don’t realize that to get to the point where Nazi soldiers could easily round up thousands of Jews, the government first made their own neighbors hate them simply for being Jews. How is that any different from hating someone for their political views?”

My understanding has now shifted to that she could have been implying Republicans were being treated like Holocaust victims, which is patently absurd. But before even recognizing this, it struck me that the passage she quotes is accurate: history is edited, and the German public was propagandized into treating Jews as the enemy to nurture complicity for their genocide.

That's not to say I agree with her, because not all identity politics are equal: someone being attacked for their religious beliefs, race, or heritage is much different from someone being attacked for their political views. But, it still remains that nobody should be attacking anybody in a civil political setting. Meaning nobody should be storming any government buildings, nobody should be showing up to election sites with guns, nobody should be picket lining a Planned Parenthood, and nobody should attack anyone based on their identity (which does not include their actions).

IANAL (obviously)... (IAONAL?)

• Every headline I've read about this says Musk is funding it.
• Every article I've read says X is funding it, to make good on Elon's promise that the company would fund legal battles for those discriminated against for their behavior on the platform
• Neither X nor Musk are defendants
• The complaint does however feature Pedro Pascal meming on the 45 IQ crowd
• The complaint also features an example of Pedro Pascal in 2020 posting a meme of Bert and Ernie (and Ducky) from Sesame Street holding up a "Black Trans Lives Matter" protest sign, a LGBTQ+ flag, and a "Defund the Police" sign respectively. The complaint alleges that Pedro Pascal was not disciplined by Disney for this, which it seems to allude is evidence of sexual discrimination. There was no mention of fair use law, though Disney likely wouldn't need to worry about that had they taken issue with his post. The allegation stands that Pascal was not disciplined for using Defendant's intellectual property to promote personal ideology
• The complaint, at least from what I can surmise, does not indicate what started the debacle on X, but tries to paint it as if users just started attacking Gina Carano. The earliest relevant artifact I could find was her uncaptioned August 2, 2020 post of a monochrome photo of a crowd giving right-hand-forward/Nazi salutes, with a red circle highlighting one man in the crowd who is not saluting. Gina would later add context: "Heartbreaking and powerful story of a man who changed his ways for the woman he loved.. love changes the world, one person at a time.❤️" How you get "Nazi sympathizer" or "bootlicker" from that is beyond me.
• The outrage against Gina allegedly intensified when X users harassed her to "say ACAB" and "use pronouns" (to identify herself, on her profile). These users posed this as a civil obligation and implied that the public would vilify her for not conforming, to which she did not yield. Gina eventually updated her profile to jokingly show "boop/bop/beep", to which she was excessively derided for (likely by bots/trolls)

"Elon Musk Is Funding [...] through X" would communicate the immediate truth. Very few media agencies thought to do so. They also do not expose any of the details I highlighted in my bullet points. Nor do they link to the publicly available complaint PDF, at least that I've seen.

This post brought to you by the Chaotic Neutral Centrists