Skip Navigation

User banner
carl_marks[use name]
carl_marks[use name] @ carl_marks_1312 @lemmy.ml
Posts
3
Comments
302
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • CCP doesn’t like minorities, especially Turkic minorities. What they do is mere assimilation and it doesn’t fall far from genocide

    The fact that Xinjiang has one of the worlds highest mosque densities and having arabic description everywhere contradicts your assessment.

    Lack of evidence is a cool term, because it’s total controlled under CCP. They don’t allow foreign media there. Hmm, what could be the reason I wonder.

    Israel has banned aljazeera and other news outlets and organizations critical of them from their territory, yet are not able to hide the genocide on the Palestinians.

    Considering this your assessment is also laughable

  • Those are vocational training centers and.noone disputes their existence, lib. Also it's funny you're sharing the Wikipedia link that used to be called "Uyghur genocide" but had to change title due to lack of evidence

  • the base evidence checks out.

    Do you mind sharing a source?

  • I have you tagged as "shit lib and running for imperialism", it tracks that you have the same view as the US state department.

  • The quick answer is because the housing market was used for speculation and was causing real estate prices and rents to rise. China introduced "three red lines" policy to mitigate this and let the housing market crash and let the billionaire CEO Hui Ka Yan (and mostly foreign Investors) hold the bag

  • Loyal Citizens of Pyongyang A documentary on the world of defectors and South Korean Intelligence (National Intelligence Service, formerly known as the KCIA)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3V4Hnl7J9H4

    The originally posted documentary is soft-censored behind an age-confirmation verification

  • Anytime AES states are mentioned in a way that doesn't align with US foreign policy. (It's a wonderful study of hegemony in action)

  • The US sanctioning Venezuela in order to destabilize has a negative impact on material conditions can have that effect of people leaving. The blame lies more on the US that does the bidding for Chevron than Venezuelas government.

  • Poll size 1200 people in the first link.. cute And the second one is Axios.

    Libs backing far right candidates and protest when faced with a socialist. Classkc

  • And the MAGAs are against big business, just like some of the Democrats.

    Lmao. That's why they stan a billionaire and Peter Thiel vice that fucks couched

  • Beijing has responded to the U.S. export controls in two ways. First, it has retaliated against U.S. companies. In May 2023, China announced that U.S. chip maker Micron failed a cybersecurity review, a dubious claim that resulted in a ban on certain domestic sales of Micron’s memory chips. This likely contributed to a 49 percent drop in revenue year-on-year for Micron in FY 2023. China also blocked a planned merger between U.S. semiconductor giant Intel and Israeli firm Tower Semiconductor by failing to rule on the transaction before a deadline set by the companies. The two companies had waited over 18 months for a ruling.

    Second, the export controls have galvanized China’s industrial policy and innovation agenda, which may threaten the U.S. semiconductor industry in the long term. China is channeling tens of billions of dollars into its domestic semiconductor industry through state-led investment funds, while forming new public-private partnerships and updating its tax incentives to boost its research capabilities. Meanwhile, it is pressuring its domestic companies to buy Chinese semiconductors, manufacturing equipment, chip design software, and other critical inputs, which provides those companies with more revenue to invest in R&D and capital. The U.S. export controls may be helping China achieve this goal. The New York Fed’s report found that Chinese firms targeted by the U.S. export controls formed new relationships with local Chinese firms to replace the now-prohibited commercial relationships with U.S. firms. These commercial relationships may not have formed if the targeted Chinese firms could still purchase U.S. products.

    The export controls also heavily incentivize Chinese firms to innovate themselves. As these companies cannot rely on U.S. firms for advanced semiconductor technologies, they must innovate in-house or partner with non-U.S. firms to develop these technologies. In one prominent example, Chinese companies Huawei and SMIC partnered to develop a 7nm chip, an advanced semiconductor with capabilities that U.S. export controls were intended to prohibit. Preventing China from producing 7nm chips indefinitely was unrealistic, as these chips can be manufactured with equipment unrestricted by U.S. export controls. Nevertheless, the chip represents a breakthrough for the Chinese semiconductor industry, which it achieved at an impressive speed despite U.S. export controls. Huawei previously relied on Qualcomm for chips of this caliber, which may lose over $10 billion in revenue in 2024 due to lost sales.

    Thank you for sharing @yogthos@lemmy.ml.

  • post your hog while you're at it

  • If I didn't read theory and be a lib, I'd write the same. How does the NATO boot taste?