Oh god. How thick can you be? You did not read correctly, indeed. The question was if the meme was political.
And it clearly is, since it references political entities and distributes the ideology of whoever is OP of the meme to a bunch of unsuspecting lurkers that falsely assume it's non-political. Also the fact that you disagree about what is and what isn't political makes it political
I dont understand the point of your comment. Also it reads overly antagonistic
Post about homeownership rate, showing china is among highest
General comment about US availability of land vs China's, hinting that US could do a lot better
You asking about the point of said general comment
Another offers explanation. Mind you home ownership is a "higher bar to clear" than mere getting rid of homelessness, because you could get rid of homelessness without having high home ownership
You for some reason clarifying that's not about homelessness, but home ownership? (The formal writing style makes it read like you're unnecessarily antagonistic and pedantic)
Pro Tip: Sort by Top All. Anarchists getting called tankie tends to get a lot of upbears because we have anarchist comrades on our instance. We're a left unity instance
I love how you guys have decided that your definitions are the only correct ones.
You're strawmaning hard here, because I never said it's a definition or that it's the only one. It's just my understanding of the term. What part of it is wrong in your opinion? I want to consider it
It's your primary weapon here, for obvious reasons.
Because it's obvious that when you're challenged on your understanding of words you have nothing to say?
Tankie is a social construct and is used to lazily discredit everyone to the left of bernie. It functions to libs the same way as "woke" functions for chuds. As a term it's basically meaningless to anyone outside of the internet.
No offence but your lack of media literacy is showing..
You understand that using WaPo as a source for American wrong doings is not the same as using WaPo as a source for wrong doings it's geopolitical rival. You'd need a Chinese outlet admitting to their faults for it to be equivalent..
Nonetheless I clicked on your link:
The disclosure comes in an investigative report from the Associated Press and a new research report by scholar Adrian Zenz for the Jamestown Foundation.
Of course you think that there are no politics, because you have a very limited understanding of politics