Yeah but the market sets the price. This is capitalism. If you want to change the price, don't go there. Pick a cheaper clinic. There are plenty of hospitals. It's up to the consumer to price shop, emergency or not. I'm sure the Mayo clinic is making razor thin margins.
That theorem basically says any problem can be solved computationally in a reasonable amount of time.
The P versus NP problem is a major unsolved problem in theoretical computer science. In informal terms, it asks whether every problem whose solution can be quickly verified can also be quickly solved.
The informal term quickly, used above, means the existence of an algorithm solving the task that runs in polynomial time, such that the time to complete the task varies as a polynomial function on the size of the input to the algorithm (as opposed to, say, exponential time).
If you prove P is not equal to NP, then we can probably assume the simulation isn't being run.
But that assumes a lot. Who is to say how a universe outside our universe might behave? Maybe they aren't constrained in the same ways we are for some unfathomable reason.
Feasible? Sure. Pick 2 people randomly during that time? Unlikely. I have nothing against diversity. And I have nothing against an AI being encouraged to produce diverse outputs. I do think it's a clear indicator of the internal prompts that guide the AIs choices.
What's the end goal here? You should be able to use fstab to mount the drive to a particular folder on every boot. That should allow you to access the mounted folder consistently.
Who governs this body of K.O.S. targets? Is it a democratically elected position? What happens if the wrong person is elected to this position and suddenly Muslims, queer, or communists are placed on this list?
Is there a perfect scheduler that is non-optimal in the Big(O) sense but is optimal if you're looking at maximizing hardware utilization? In other words, scheduler that takes a long time to determine CPU utilization for each process, but provides an optimal total CPU utilization? I realize that it would not be ideal since we'd essentially have these "sudden stops" as it recalculates the schedule. I'm just more interested in the theory.
Yeah but in your example, you wouldn't need to look anything up either. You're presumably very familiar with the offset of your time to their time? You'd also become familiar with their "universal time" versus your time. You'd just know what hours they'd be awake and asleep because you will have done the translation a few times.
In addition, I - personally - would find it easier to memorize times in a single system: e.g. remembering that people in China are awake from 9pm to 8am is easier for me to remember. I typically already do this in my own head. I'll convert times to my own local time and then memorize that. Do other people not do that? I find it much easier to look at my own clock and know if I can reach out to someone internationally.
People want unexpected controversial unpopular opinions. By way of example, "videogames are not fun" might seem generally unpopular but then the post gets a ton of comments corroborating the idea. Seems like those get the most attention.
