but we can say that at some point some proto-chicken ancestor laid an egg that was different enough genetically that it counts as a chicken
This is not correct. At no point can the offspring in a single generation be differnet enough to be called a different species.
What we call "species" are just current snapshots of time. Species only make sense in a narrow timeframe. In reality things change very slowley over a large amount of time and there a no clear transition points.
If we count it as a chicken egg only, then it depends on if you describe a chicken egg as “an egg laid by a chicken” or “an egg that could hatch into a chicken”.
I think we watched the same youtube video on the topic!
The concept of "eggs" is way, way older then chickens. Fish lay eggs. So in this case, it's definitly the egg that came first.
You can dig deeper, but eventually you end up on the what is a "chicken egg" and a "chicken" .. which means you have to deal with taxonomy. And well, it's just made up... so that doesn't really lead anywhere.
If you follow some of the links to pirate sites in the article you'll get redirected to some anti-piracy site which amongst other things tells you this:
That's not an argument for banning nicotine in general. That's an argument for banning smoking in public indoor places, which I think is already the case in most countries.
Years. Hell, it's months since I've even seen one ... and that was just because sometimes when you start your browser a page will load before the adblocker is loaded.
But the political positions aren't even coloured at all? It's blue for men and red for women.