Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)BU
Posts
0
Comments
213
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Please learn to read. Again. I thought I wasn't on Reddit anymore.

    $50 for a pi. Not for clustering. For one. That's it.

    An X86 PC is gonna cost you hundreds. That's how I can cluster rpi, for the same cost. I hope you now know how to do basic math.

  • Pass, I'll take the cluster of raspberry pis for the same cost... For the purpose of self hosting my cluster is going to out perform your x86. Like why are you going to spend hundreds of dollars for an x86 that will do fine when you can spend $50 for a pi that will also do fine?

    Then you can just cluster those pis and get redundancy

  • The one time I took a train for a mid range distance, it cost like $250. That being said, I didn't have to drive through NYC traffic, deal with tolls, or deal with parking and had a lot of room to myself.

    But it was also slow and $250 from Philly to NYC? Buhhhhh probably wouldn't again lol

  • Network: I constantly have problems with ipv6 connections to steam on Linux, try disabling ipv6. It's counterintuitive to have ipv4 run faster and more stable than 6 but for whatever reason that's a thing.

    Rainmeter: try conky.

    • Is it better to run KDE for this or GNOME?

    This would be replacing KDE or GNOME, that being said you can still use tooling from either if you wish but for the most part the DE you're using tooling from would be wasted disk space

    • Is Hyprland overrated? Are there any other alternatives?

    Haven't used hyprland myself, but

    is a solid choice

  • One of my pups is like this, everyone thinks it's cute, so I never tell them why it's like this.... but, she got her ear bit by an asshole dog. It was clear through. It's healed now, other than it flops.

    After it happened though (and I, unashamedly, kicked the fuck out of the dogs face once I got them separated because the owner wasn't doing shit( I'm still furious)), she was back to her happy bouncy life. The vet didn't even have to put her under to clean it, she just... chilled. "Yeah, thanks bro, that was bothering me"

    American bulldogs man... they'll just shrug off anything as long as you're there with them.

  • Claiming their questions were answered similarity in areas where abortion is legal and there are no extra risks.

    It's almost like there's been a trend across states to limit access to this due to the federal court case. And pregnancy could last longer than the individuals remaining access to this procedure.

  • To what end? Should we not publish studies that require additional research? If we don't publish those how will others in the field know to investigate certain areas?

    I mean, if you honestly don't want things published until we know all the facts, then science and research will honestly grind to a halt.

    That's how this shit works ... Small, iterative steps. It's slow, it's not sexy, but it's worked for thousands of years.

  • If a multimillionaire puts their assets into holdings and gets it back after their tenure, then the incentive to corruption still exists because they can still make decisions that affect those assets even indirectly.

    Not really if they don't know what the portfolio is composed of, the only way they could definitely positively affect it is if they make decisions good for the whole of the economy.

    That's what I was actually proposing, the politician would transfer complete holding to someone like vanguard and they would diversify the assets in a reasonable way. The politician would not have control over it or even see what stocks are in the account, but still be able to benefit from the country's economy.

    All the politician could see is the valuation of the holdings in the event they do want to liquidate, but again, they wouldn't directly choose what is being liquidated (because they don't know what they have)

  • As far as divesting, would you be okay with not necessarily liquidating but moving investments into a 3rd party holder?

    Basically like "okay this is what you had in an investment fund, now a third party (for sake of argument fidelity) takes over the fund and now fidelity advisers manage it in its entirety until the person is no longer a representative.

    The question really being, what kind of divesting do you want? Because straight liquidation could still negatively impact younger candidates, given that the liquidation would remove potential legitimate interest from their portfolio. Meaning that them running could negatively impact their future.