In his 1st interview, friend who warned officials of Maine shooter says 'I literally spelled it out'
bustrpoindextr @ bustrpoindextr @lemmy.world Posts 0Comments 213Joined 2 yr. ago
bustrpoindextr @ bustrpoindextr @lemmy.world
Posts
0
Comments
213
Joined
2 yr. ago
Your bad faith excuses for genocide
This right here shows you didn't actually understand what I've been writing.
First off, please read my fucking comments, I don't support what the Israel government is doing. You're having an emotional response because I'm showing this situation is more complicated.
None of that is "ample fucking evidence" if I'm lying so are you.
I'm sorry this conflict is more complicated than you'd like, but one person who happens to be in a government making a statement does not mean that's the government's opinion. You need this thing called evidence. Give me a whistle blower, give me documents. Don't give me one or two crazy people, there are crazy people everywhere and they aren't representative of everyone.
Do you think that it's America's opinion that there are Jewish space lasers? Because MTG an American politician made that comment. Or that after rape you should get a shot of estrogen from the ER, that one's from Ron Paul. Those must be America's opinion according to the logic you're presenting.
Also with regards to the safe zone issues. If that happened frequently you'd have an argument, and if it keeps happening that's great evidence. But it's not happened that much so it's going to be really easy to argue that it was an accident, a misfire, broken communication etc etc etc.
Again, there are war crimes Israel has committed, if you take them to kangaroo court, you should come at them correctly.
People handle this situation like it's a sporting event. Like one side can do no wrong and if you're not in lock step with one side then you must be in full collusion with the other. Completely ignoring that one side is a terrorist organization that took over by force, the other side is an apartied government that's perpetrated a siege for years, both have civilian deaths on their hands and caught in the middle are actual people that didn't ask for this.
But yeah, thanks for your comment.
While I don't disagree with what you're saying. I don't fully agree with it either.
Because what I'm actually stating is. Don't charge a pedophile with murder, or don't charge a murderer with child molestation.
Words and charges matter.
Think about it like this, since there's no hard evidence that this is a genocide because of the legal definition. Israel is likely going to win this case. That means they can say they defended their actions in court and won, can't we all agree that's bad?
Charge them with what you can actually prove. They have committed war crimes, it's just not likely feasible to prove this is genocide without a lot more evidence.
Don't get me wrong, sure investigate it, make sure it isn't. But...
Yes I would, I mean. There's literally no evidence in that article. It's just detailing a situation, a horrific situation that needs to stop. But there's no evidence of genocide. Please again, provide evidence.
Yes, Israel has committed other war crimes and should be held responsible. But that's not the argument.
Prove it was intentional and not a misfire, a problem with civilians accessing up to date information etc etc. Gaza is very small and very densely populated. You have to prove without a shadow of a doubt intent here. It ain't gonna happen.
Again, you'd be better off taking Israel to court on war crimes you can actually prove. Ones that don't require proving this intent.
Prove it. Give any evidence, prove that you're smarter than basically every lawyer outside of the South Africa team and prove genocide.
If you think I'm a supporter of the Israeli government you didn't actually read my comments.
You people act like this conflict is between sports teams, fucking hell.
That doesn't matter in a legal sense.
Okay my dudes. Look. Israel thinks UN court is a kangaroo court, but they're sending a crack team of lawyers. Why? PR. Because they know they'll win and then they can say "we defended our actions in court and won"
Sure, take them to court, but take them to court for things they'd actually lose.
fucking useful tool
Thanks mate. I know I'm useful. As are dictionaries, and the lawyers that I'm basically just quoting...
I spread no misinformation. My entire stance was effectively "it's hard to prove intent" but good job getting aggressively upset about common knowledge.
Imma go ahead and put this edit at the top.
Edit: the following legal explanation does not absolve Israel from other war crimes they have definitely committed such as collective punishment. It's just explaining why "genocide" is not an appropriate claim.
Edit over, original post follows.
The problem with the genocide claim is actually laid out by a lawyer in the article. I'm sure this comment will get removed because every time I try to explain this someone reports me.
Genocide is the intentional murdering of a race or ethnic group. Hamas is not an ethnic group, that's the intended target as long as Israel warns or attempts to move civilian populations away from bombing targets it's going to be really hard to prove they are intentionally killing those civilians. Israel has done those measures the entire conflict.
The civilian casualty number could be much higher and not matter to the definition of genocide. Because genocide requires intent, regardless of the number.
For a modern day example of genocide look at Sudan, where people are going door to door shooting members of an ethnic group. That's genocide. The intentional killing of an ethnic group.
I believe the cutoff is in the 80's?
All of their tools are completely unrelated to what craftsman used to be.
Old craftsman or new? Because if new you might not be Craftsman very long. Old craftsman tools will outlive us all and if you can find them at a garage sale, buy em.
New craftsman tools are pretty much just junk.
Yes, owner surveys over tens of thousands of individuals regardless of breed meaning no implicit bias. The survey finds the same result across all breeds, the survey isn't specific to pits.
You really thought you did something there didn't you? Please learn to trust science over inflammatory media
Like if everyone claimed they had a perfect puppy, your critique would hold water, but flaws were reported across all breeds...
It's absolutely not "deep in their brain" breed doesn't really impact behavior
How you raise a dog does. If you see an aggressive dog, blame the owner.
Well your article isn't a study, it's a literary review from a very biased source of a Colleen Lynn
In fact if you want to read up on your source: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dogsbite.org
You can see that she complains about science and ignores expert opinions in the field because they disagree with her.
It's very telling when her literary review comes to very different conclusions than actual scientists performing studies in the field.
Okay, because I saw you're a fan of banpitbull subreddit.
I need to ask a very simple question. Do you care about actual safety, or do you just want pitbulls banned? Like what is your goal?
Because all science in the last 5 years states people, not pitbulls, are the problem. Globally. That's the issue.
If you actually want "less harm and death done" then you need to listen to the scientific experts and stop pushing for BSL, and instead push for things that move towards the goal of less harm and death.
But okay let's address the rest now
Are you shitting me? https://financesonline.com/number-of-dogs-in-the-us/
You don't need to have a census to have a pretty damn good idea of how many there are. And you all keep telling me that I'm disingenuous.
You say that and then the link you provided did not give me a very good idea about per capita of the breeds... I have no idea how many of any breed there are.
This is a persons representation of a study. Not the study. but it links to here (https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abk0639) So if breed has nothing to do with anything. How come there's qualities organized by breed by the study? You can't claim that behaviors aren't affected by breed, then show me a study that shows a bunch of behaviors organized by breed. And you all keep telling me that I'm disingenuous.
You are being disingenuous... Less than 9% difference across all breeds. A dog is a dog is a dog. Some howl, some don't. Some are more active. A dog is a dog is a dog.
Except this misses one big premise... Amount of cases can be exactly the same, but severity of each case can go down severely. Also amount of cases can be the same, but have less fatalities!
Well it was counting hospitalizations... So it's safe to say we're only talking about severe ones..
That combined with the pseudoscience that was spewed by Merritt Clifton, that everyone still quotes today, and you've got yourself some statistical issues.
It's not larping when you're actually military.
But that brings up a big point. He was military. Support the troops and give them mental healthcare. Also screen them, he should not have still been in the reserves.