It's pretty incredible to look at the build and launch sites back then vs now. None of the predicted program timelines were close to right, but the progress is still really impressive.
I'm actually kind of shocked by how useless and jokey most the comments are on that reddit post. Did the main sub change policies at some point? That seems worse than an old lounge thread.
I agree for most other companies, but SpaceX's whole MO is to keep pushing limits and prototyping and testing. They probably could have stabilized the Raptor design and had something more reliable if they stopped trying to push the performance limits. This booster has some other big changes that are worth testing, so as long as they can get through stage separation, flying it as-is would have a lot of value.
I'm still worried about the Raptor shutdowns, but I'm crossing my fingers that it's just extra conservative limits during the testing. As long as there isn't really a risk to the pad, though, I hope they go for it and launch regardless of some flaky engines.
I get your point, but can you honestly go through the SpaceX contracts and tell me which ones should have gone to someone else, especially on the launch side? The only thing I can really think of is the initial Artemis HLS, but NASA was so budget constrained that they were between a rock and a hard place on that one. SpaceX has the most launch availability and best prices right now, so it would be irresponsible, if not literally impossible, to launch most payloads with anyone else.
China is on there 6 times if you count CAS Space, i-Space, ExPace, and Space Pioneer. Those smaller companies don't add a ton, but it drops to "only" 6.5x if you include them.
They were also selling Starlink terminals at a big loss early on, so either that has turned around with the new production lines or they make enough money to offset the loss. They're moving some serious quantities of those things.
Same. I like starting with almost random combinations of class/race/skills that aren't close to min/maxed together, then discovering the character at the table.
I get that some people have a harder time improvising or really want to play essentially a character from some media they like. And that's fine. Different strokes for different folks. The essay backstories just wear me out and don't seem appropriate for low level characters, though.
Four Bandwagon missions are currently scheduled. According to SpaceX’s rideshare website, those missions are scheduled for April and November 2024 and February and May 2025.
So that's even fewer payloads for the dedicated smallsat launchers. Some of them have a decent backlog and/or are diversifying (Rocket Lab, Firefly, Relativity), but I don't see how Astra and ABL could end up with viable rockets.
I don't really see a point in flying Artemis 3 without at least going to Gateway, which won't be ready in NRHO until probably late 2026. Plus, Artemis 4 will be NET 2028 because of EUS/ML2 development, so I don't see what the big hurry would be for the "cadence" schedule.
I'm not trying to excuse Starship delays just because other contractors are also behind. All these delays suck. There's just so much work to do.
Has 2025 for Starliner-1 been confirmed anywhere? I think it's right, but I don't think they officially said so.
They seemed noncommittal about timing and made it sound like Starliner-1 could still be late 2024, but that feels impossible. If Crew 8 is Feb-Aug '24 and Starliner CFT-2 is NET March '24, during Crew-8, then Crew-9 would have to be on a Dragon to give enough time to turn around Starliner certification and get the next capsule ready.
I'm hoping this test was mostly for the deluge system, not the booster, so they were running with extra safe engine shutdown limits. That's just blind hope, though.
I mean, I get the hardware rich testing mindset, but I thought the engine design was supposed to be stabilizing and getting more reliable. You have to admit that losing 4 engines in under 3 seconds isn't great.
It's kind of a mixed blessing that the FTS approval process is so drawn out, because now they have all this time with nothing better to do than keep improving the pad.
It's pretty incredible to look at the build and launch sites back then vs now. None of the predicted program timelines were close to right, but the progress is still really impressive.