It really does
bss03 @ bss03 @infosec.pub Posts 0Comments 412Joined 2 yr. ago
bss03 @ bss03 @infosec.pub
Posts
0
Comments
412
Joined
2 yr. ago
I used to snack on dried pineapple or cashews, but I found I was still getting hungry frequently, sometimes within an hour of snacking. I've also tried to yogurt and granola snacks, to similar results.
If I don't just "be hungry", I overeat.
My "best" snack so far is popcorn, because the kcal/volume is so low, so it takes me longer to eat.
Well, I'm down 100 lbs from where I started. But, between work and caregiver duties, I can usually only get to the gym 3 days a week, and sometimes less.
I buy quinoa and beans in bulk, so there's not exactly a barcode to scan for those either. I actually need to avoid pre-packaged food even more than I do currently. The low-calorie ones tend to be high sodium, and a lot of just too many calories.
My weight also fluctuates more than I'd expect. I take it on the same scale, and the same part of my morning (nearly first thing in the morning, just after I brush my teeth) and I'll routinely lose more than a pound (or after a bad day, gain more than 10), tho experts really say losing more than about a pound a week is unsustainable.
I don't feel fat ... but my BMI is obese. And, I feel like I'm "always" hungry. The only thing keeping me at this weight is that I keep up my exercise and just suffer through hunger sometimes. :(
There's no way I can afford Wegovy, and I'm sure I'd be one of the people that get blinded by it even if I could afford.
- In https://lemm.ee/comment/20947041 they claimed "implicit type coercion" and showed many examples; they did NOT claim "string concatenation".
- However, that was in reply to https://lemmy.world/comment/17473361 which was talking about "implicit conversion to string" which is a specific type of "implicit type coercion"; NONE of the examples given involved a conversion to string.
- But also, that was in reply to https://lemm.ee/comment/20939144 which only mentions "implicit type coercion" in general.
So, I think probably everyone in the thread is "correct", but you are actually talking past one another.
I think the JS behavior is a bad design choice, but it is well documented and consistent across implementations.
I think it's less about type system, and more about lack of a separate compilation step.
With a compilation step, you can have error messages that developers see, but users don't. (Hopefully, these errors enable the developers to reduce the errors that users see, and just generally improve the UX, but that's NOT guaranteed.)
Without a compilation step, you have to assign some semantics to whatever random source string your interpreter gets. And, while you can certainly make that an error, that would rarely be helpful for the user. JS instead made the choice to, as much as possible, avoid error semantics in favor of silent coercions, conversions, and conflations in order to make every attempt to not "error-out" on the user.
It would be a very painful decade indeed to now change the semantics for some JS source text.
Purescript is a great option. Typescript is okay. You could also introduce a JS-to-JS "compilation" step that DID reject (or at least warn the developer) for source text that "should" be given an error semantic, but I don't know an "off-the-shelf" approach for that -- other than JSLint.
(.) is a valid expression in Haskell. Normally it is the prefix form of the infix operator . that does function
composition. (.) (2*) (1+) 3 = ((2*) . (1+)) 3 = 2 * (1 + 3) = 8.
But, the most common use of the word "boob" in my experience in Haskell is the "boobs operator": (.)(.). It's usage in Haskell is limited (tho valid), but it's appearance in racy ASCII art predates even the first versions on Haskell.
Oddly enough, in Haskell (as defined by the report), length is monomorphic, so it just doesn't work on tuples (type error).
Due to the way kinds (types of types) work in Haskell, Foldable instances can only operate over (i.e. length only counts) elements of the last/final type argument. So, for (,) it only counts the second part, which is always there exactly once. If you provided a Foldable for (,,,) it would also have length of 1.
This is my favorite language: GHC Haskell
GHC Haskell:
GHCi> length (2, "foo")
1
I guess running. About 4 years ago, I started on the treadmill with an exhausting 30min/mi. Earlier this week I completed my first 7min/mi. Along the way, I added a 28min/5k@1.5% and am working on a 60min/10k (today did 62min/10k).
I saw one that claimed "plumber approved" and it made me so mad we don't have meaningful laws against deceptive advertising.
I'd like really sewer-safe wet wipes. If tried several bidets and did not like them, definitely worse than wipes IMO.
Rachet theory. R moves one direction; D refuses to move in the other.
It's not entirely false, but it's also not the whole story. Voting D is better than staying home. It might not be better than direct action -- but given the size of the voting window, it's probably not completely eclipsed by your activism. (If it is, watch out for the FBI and keep working for a better world, comrade.)
ISTR that canonically, Earth is under non-interference by The Culture (except for Special Circumstances) as a "control group".
... for now.
🌮ACO
T🌮CO
TA🌮O
TAC🌮
I was disappointed I had to scroll this far for an "Only Connect" reference.
I think in series 1 it was Greek letters and people complained it was too academic, so they switched to hieroglyphs to spite the feedback.
It would be a poor idea to introduce a coin that couldn't be easily accommodated by coin-op machines. The Sacajawea was specifically designed to be the same size and magnetic signature was previous dollar coins so that coin-op machines that has taken "silver dollars" would also take Sacajaweas without updating.
When I was implementing penny-rounding for Canada in Point-of-Sale software, I was told we were legally required to round in a specific way.
I would imagine the U.S. probably will do something similar. Tho, we might follow the model of some of the other countries that have eliminated their pennies. Executive orders are a poor way to cover all the knock-on issues that some with eliminating the penny.
I'm absolutely sure I experience "lonely mouth", but that's what I mentally refer to a "desire to eat" vs. "hunger". My desire to eat is nearly unlimited. I'll literally be leaving a restaurant and start thinking about the next flavor palette to send to my tongue.
No, the hunger I'm currently having problems with is coming from my guts, a tightness or emptiness usually just below the sternum (or as low as my innie), sometimes but not always accompanied by noise that while generally internal-only is sometime externally audible.
I can ignore it. I often initially choose to quiet it through consuming water or other zero-calorie fluids, but when it doesn't go away within a few minutes of fluid consumption, that approach isn't going to work. I can just ignore/suffer it; I have done 72-hour fasting before, but I found it neither enjoyable nor very productive (didn't seem to affect weight loss rate overall). After a while it does fail to distract me as much, but then comes back at irregular intervals.
I know there's probably a happy medium out there. And, it's even possible I don't need to lose quite as much weight as I think. But, I'd really like to have visible abs -- I can do 100 body-weight sit-ups, or 190lb. sitting abdominal crunches, but I still have a fat cap that hides whatever muscles are there.