Nah that’s silly and how would that even be enforced? “Unpaind word of mouth” - you going to interrogate people how they know something?
You would investigate if there's a complaint or other probable cause, just like every other crime. Some people will get away with breaking the law, maybe, but as long as the law can be enforced effectively but not arbitrarily it's not a bad law on enforcement grounds.
I am on record elsewhere stating that I believe there are better approaches than banning advertisement wholesale, yes. But, I'm not going to let the better be the enemy of the good while I'm living in the bad. An improvement of the status quo, even if it might be in the "wrong direction" is still an improvement.
My switch is in the closet, so no. But, if I did currently play switch games, yeah.
I dislike the pricing, but I feel like it's probably fair. I like comparing $price/hr-entertainment vs. going to the movies. I think for most games, it will still be better value. But, I can understand using other metrics. A dropout.tv subscription is only 6.99/mo and there's at least a couple hours of new stuff being added to that each month, I think.
Almost anything that can be remotely subjective ("best", "better", "more effective", etc.) gets pushed into the "puffery" exception of (US) truth-in-advertising laws.
Even very objective claims that are untrue can be upheld, if they are (e.g.) based on an internal study. Even if there's a better sourced, more repeated study with stronger claims (in the other direction) that is widely published. The companies involved just claim ignorance (which isn't illegal) and offer to pull that claim from future campaigns (as if that addresses any of the damage caused by the false claims). Their lawyers can file continuances until the campaigns they've already paid for are complete anyway.
So, in theory misrepresentations is banned, but it happens and is often not punished when it does.
But, yeah, current advertising is largely not about making any sort of claim; it's just telling a story the the customer and see themselves in, but is made somehow better (that real life) because the product/brand is present.
Price lists / labels at the point of sale are not advertising. Unpaid word of mouth is not commercial advertising. You don't seem to be following the thread very well.
The communication methods mentioned in the summary can work for this. It might take longer than a quarter-year to peak/saturate the market but introducing such a novel product should require longer-term thought.
The future is not required to contain the business models of the past. More specially, I don't believe "there are businesses that would fail" is a good argument. We need UBI or a better social safety net for the people in those businesses, but the businesses can simply fail and nothing will be lost.
That said, I think advertising can probably be reformed through a combination of removing the puffery exception, enhanced enforcement of existing truth in advertising laws, and increased civil liability for falsehoods at all layers: product (Kraft, Nestle, Tesla), production ("Mad men"),, and propagation (networks, Hulu, YT)
Agreed. The misogyny is clear, even ignoring any hint of trans issues. But, I don't know what a settlement would look like and how much effort it would be to fight WMT lawyers.
"Sure my boss took advantage of me, but I will always remain firm on this point: it was a consensual relationship," Lewinsky wrote in 2014. "Any 'abuse' came in the aftermath, when I was made a scapegoat in order to protect his powerful position."
Lewinsky says she now sees that her relationship with Clinton was full of "inappropriate abuse of authority, station, and privilege."
"Now, at 44, I’m beginning (just beginning) to consider the implications of the power differentials that were so vast between a president and a White House intern," she wrote. "I’m beginning to entertain the notion that in such a circumstance the idea of consent might well be rendered moot."
I'm almost certain they mean Reddit, but there are a lot of sites that aren't lemmy.dbzer0.com ... like lemm.ee and infosec.pub ... even some sites that aren't Lemmy instances like infosec.exchance or hachyderm.io.
ISTR you can do the sieve thing with true living sponges, too. Life on earth is wild. I wonder if it will be considered mild once we find some interesting life off-planet.
You don’t think retirement is a human right or at least should be?
In a post-scarcity society, no one should have to work. But, if there is scarcity, I don't believe those with less-working-time should (important EDIT) NOT be forced to provide for those with more-working-time.
I do think government-organized retirement is a good thing, but I don't feel it is a human right.
let’s pump the brakes on the healthcare
I didn't say that. I think healthcare in the U.S. is woeful, and hardly anything that is a human right is provided as a right. And, we should massively expand the availability of healthcare.
I did imply there are some medical procedures that I don't believe are human rights. Depending on who I'm talking to, we might even disagree whether a procedure is medical or not. Some people swear by their chiropractors or essential oil treatments.
I have 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4 in my resolver configuration. I've heard that 9.9.9.9 might not be poisoned like this. Besides running my own DNS (not even on a dare), is there a good way to get uncensored DNS resutls?
"half" is not really correct; I know that's not the point though.
The American people collectively had the power to prevent this, and collectively chose not to. Fortunately for me (an American), collective punishment is a war crime, for now.
You would investigate if there's a complaint or other probable cause, just like every other crime. Some people will get away with breaking the law, maybe, but as long as the law can be enforced effectively but not arbitrarily it's not a bad law on enforcement grounds.
I am on record elsewhere stating that I believe there are better approaches than banning advertisement wholesale, yes. But, I'm not going to let the better be the enemy of the good while I'm living in the bad. An improvement of the status quo, even if it might be in the "wrong direction" is still an improvement.