britaliope @ britaliope @kourjetez.bzh

Posts

0

Comments

17

Joined

4 mo. ago

I'm inthi picture and it hurt to see

Ideally everyone should have his account hosted on a small instance managed by people you can trust, ettqer because you know tqem personally or beqause you trust someone who trust them.

Having huge instances which host a significative part of the userbase kinda goes against tho concept of decentralization. But in practice it rarely work that way

that's why if you disagree with censorship/moderation policy of an instance, you can move to another one. You can't do that on reddit.

The idea behind lemmy (and every other decentralized platform) is not that you can't get banned. The idea is that f the mods of one instance decde to go crazy, are bought by malicious people, or if there is an hostile takover (like what happened to freenode), then the network isn't compromized, and ideally there are plenty of other instances with a moderation policy you agree with and where you can recreate an account

at exists without a terms of use and privacy policy. I still feel everyone overreacted about Firefox. It’s funnier how many people said they switched to Brave because of it and all the super shady stuff Brave has done.

Being angry at the Mozilla foundation for those changes is understandable. Switching to Brave because of it is plain stupid.

There are multiple way to de this. The easiest solution would be to une a second disk with same size or bigger and clone the current one onto the new one, using dd or clonezilla

if you have enough size on your dis_ for a second root partition, you can use dd to clone the existing root partition in the new one, edit /etc/fstab on the new one to point to the correct root partition, and us grub-mkconfig if you use grub, use grub-mkconfig to reconfigure it. It should automatically detect the new partition.

He's not dellusional, he just don't have a clue of whathe's talking about and just throw around keywords and try to look smart.

As longas you're not familiar with the subject it works well.

remember when he told programers to print some code they wrote previous weeks ? Or when he tried to impress people with his knowledge of PoE2 and Diablo 4 ? Qe has done the same for decades, at spacex and tesla as well.

It's a known fact that SpaceX have an entire eam of full time people whose job is listening to elon bullshit and being the yesmen so he feels validated, then actual engineers take decisions.

IIRC there were the same with tesla and for some reason the system stopped working. And then, the cybertruck happened.

refactor is one thing, rewrite everything in a new language is another thing.

well the new ruleset they will implement is quite simple:

IF user wants money AND user is rich THEN accept request ELSE fuck off

the tricky part is to say fuck off in a subtle enough way their maga shills think it's perfectly normal in order to save the nation blah blah blah

Also : it's very complex and it happens to work fine for decades.

If one day i write a code project and manage to make it work without any major issues for several decades, there is no way i attemptto rewrite it.

can someone make a quick intro to what happends for microsoft to block organicmaps account ?

yea...unfortunately this is not happening. Back in the days where AI didn't only meant LLM or generative algs, people tried to predict crime with algorithms. It have been shown that they exibhit the same bias humans do because they learnt for humans. One of maiy examples: https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing but i think i read stories like this happening well before 2010.

But wait ! There is more ! This isn't something new at all. Before police used algorithms, even before computers existed, police forces tranied dogs to help them in their missions (defending people, detecting drugs.....). Guess what ? The dogs also learnt the bias of trainers. https://daily.jstor.org/the-police-dog-as-weapon-of-racial-terror/, https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2011/01/07/132738250/report-drug-sniffing-dogs-are-wrong-more-often-than-right are examples for both categories.

So yeah. Unbiased AI, or dogs, or unicorns won't happen for as long as we humans training them are biased.

Honestly i prefer that than people who become violent, or spend tons of money without realizing. That one is just funny (and at least he still remembered it was her girlfriend lol)

I'd like him as a foreign affairs minister, eu ambassador or somewhere in the EU governing body. I think he'll be great there.

As a president for France, he's definitively not and for so many reasons you qan't list them.

wow savage

I mean, yes, on paper, they are part of the nuclear shield protecting Europe. But europe still to have USA approval to use those nukes. And i'm definitively not sure Trump administration will ever approve Germany use those nukes, especially against Russia (and russia knows it).

So in practice, i don't think it's more than a piece of paper. It's not a line of defense if the country that own those weapons and troops is hostile / indifferent to an invasion.

It's the same debate than F-35. Yes, on paper, it is better than Gripen, typhoon, eurofighters, or rafales. But if US disable them / refuse to provide parts / give intel to ennemy, then they are basically unusable in a real environment, so it's just a very expensive decoration to use for meeting demonstrations.

is it really such a huge deal ? Afaik "ballistic dead rekoning" is really, really accurate and isnt difficult to automate (it's mostly math after all)